Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/category url #196

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024
Merged

Fix/category url #196

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

happychuks
Copy link
Collaborator

@happychuks happychuks commented Dec 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a slug field to the category model, enhancing URL-friendly identification.
    • Updated the admin interface to display the slug alongside existing fields.
    • Introduced error handling for article retrieval by category using the new category_slug parameter.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved uniqueness enforcement for the slug field in the category model.
  • Documentation

    • Updated serializer to include the new slug field with help text.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications to the Category model and its associated components within a Django application. Key changes include the addition of a slug field to the Category model, updates to the CategoryAdmin to display the slug, and adjustments to the CategorySerializer to include the slug field. Additionally, the retrieve_by_category method in ArticleViewSet has been updated to utilize the new category_slug parameter for improved clarity in article retrieval by category.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
server/apps/research/admin/category_admin.py Updated list_display in CategoryAdmin to include slug and added readonly_fields for slug.
server/apps/research/migrations/0015_category_slug.py Added slug field to category model as SlugField(blank=True, max_length=255).
server/apps/research/migrations/0016_alter_category_slug.py Modified slug field to enforce uniqueness: SlugField(blank=True, max_length=255, unique=True).
server/apps/research/models/category.py Added slug field and generate_slug method; overridden save method to auto-generate slugs.
server/apps/research/serializers/category_serializer.py Added slug field to CategorySerializer and updated fields list in Meta class.
server/apps/research/views.py Updated retrieve_by_category method to use category_slug instead of category.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: auto-redirect url when slug changes. #193: The changes in this PR relate to the management of slugs, including the addition of slug history, which is directly connected to the modifications made to the CategoryAdmin class in the main PR that also involves the slug field.

Suggested reviewers

  • losndu

🐰 In the garden of code, I hop and play,
With slugs now in place, brightening the way.
Categories bloom, with names that will sing,
In admin and serializers, joy they will bring!
So let’s celebrate this change, oh what a delight,
For every little slug makes our project just right! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 695afae and 7286a89.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/apps/research/admin/category_admin.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • server/apps/research/admin/category_admin.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
server/apps/research/admin/category_admin.py (1)

8-11: Consider adding 'slug' to search_fields

The slug field has been correctly added to list_display. Consider also adding it to search_fields to allow administrators to search by both name and slug.

-    search_fields = ('name',)
+    search_fields = ('name', 'slug')
server/apps/research/migrations/0015_category_slug.py (1)

16-16: Consider adding db_index for performance

Since the slug field will be used in URL lookups, consider adding db_index=True for better query performance.

-            field=models.SlugField(blank=True, max_length=255),
+            field=models.SlugField(blank=True, max_length=255, db_index=True),
server/apps/research/models/category.py (2)

14-17: Consider handling name changes

The current implementation only generates a slug if one doesn't exist. Consider regenerating the slug when the name changes to keep them in sync.

 def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
-    if not self.slug:
+    if not self.slug or (self.pk and self.name != Category.objects.get(pk=self.pk).name):
         self.slug = self.generate_slug()        
     super().save(*args, **kwargs)

22-39: LGTM! Robust slug generation implementation

The implementation is thread-safe and handles conflicts well. Consider adding a maximum iteration limit to the while loop as a safeguard against edge cases.

     def generate_slug(self):
         if not self.name:
             raise ValueError("Name is required to generate slug")
 
         base_slug = slugify(self.name)
         slug = base_slug
         num = 1
+        MAX_ATTEMPTS = 1000  # Prevent infinite loops in edge cases
         with transaction.atomic():
-            while (
+            while num <= MAX_ATTEMPTS and (
                 Category.objects.select_for_update()
                 .filter(slug=slug)
                 .exclude(id=self.id)  # Exclude current instance when updating
                 .exists()
             ):
                 slug = f"{base_slug}-{num}"
                 num += 1
+            if num > MAX_ATTEMPTS:
+                raise ValueError(f"Could not generate unique slug after {MAX_ATTEMPTS} attempts")
         return slug
server/apps/research/views.py (1)

105-111: LGTM! Consider optimizing the database query

The implementation correctly uses slugs for category lookup. However, we can optimize the database queries by combining the existence check with the main query.

     @action(detail=False, methods=['get'], url_path=r'category/(?P<category_slug>[-\w]+)')
     def retrieve_by_category(self, request, category_slug=None):
         """Retrieve article list by category."""
         try:
-            instances = Article.objects.filter(categories__slug=category_slug)
-            if not instances.exists():
+            instances = Article.objects.filter(categories__slug=category_slug).select_related('categories')
+            if not instances:
                 return Response({'error': 'No articles found for this category'}, status=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4111e2b and 695afae.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • server/apps/research/admin/category_admin.py (1 hunks)
  • server/apps/research/migrations/0015_category_slug.py (1 hunks)
  • server/apps/research/migrations/0016_alter_category_slug.py (1 hunks)
  • server/apps/research/models/category.py (1 hunks)
  • server/apps/research/serializers/category_serializer.py (1 hunks)
  • server/apps/research/views.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • server/apps/research/migrations/0016_alter_category_slug.py
🔇 Additional comments (4)
server/apps/research/serializers/category_serializer.py (1)

Line range hint 6-10: LGTM! Well-structured serializer changes

The slug field is correctly configured as read-only with appropriate max_length and helpful documentation. The field ordering in Meta is logical.

server/apps/research/migrations/0015_category_slug.py (1)

13-17: Verify data migration needs

While the slug field is correctly added, consider the following:

  1. Existing categories will have empty slugs. Consider adding a data migration to generate slugs for existing categories.
  2. Verify that the new URL patterns using slugs don't conflict with existing routes.
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the URL patterns and Category model definition.


Let me check one more thing to verify the Category model and its relationships.


Let me check the content of both migrations and the Category model definition.


No data migration needed - automatic slug generation is handled

The Category model has built-in slug generation in its save() method, which automatically creates slugs for both new and existing records. Additionally:

  1. The model's generate_slug() method handles uniqueness conflicts
  2. URL patterns in urls.py are already configured to work with slugs
  3. The two-step migration (0015 and 0016) correctly adds the field and its unique constraint

No additional data migration is needed as empty slugs will be populated automatically when categories are saved.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing URL patterns that might conflict with category slugs
echo "Checking URL patterns in urls.py files:"
fd -e py -x grep -l "path.*category" {}

# Check if there are existing categories that would need migration
echo "Checking for Category model usage:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class Category(models.Model)'

Length of output: 326


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check URL patterns in research urls.py and views.py
echo "Content of research/urls.py:"
cat ./server/apps/research/urls.py

echo -e "\nContent of research/views.py (category-related):"
rg "category" ./server/apps/research/views.py -B2 -A2

echo -e "\nChecking Category model definition:"
rg "class Category" ./server/apps/research/models.py -A5

Length of output: 2479


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Category model and its relationships
echo "Searching for Category model and related code:"
rg -l "Category" ./server/apps/research/

echo -e "\nChecking models.py content:"
cat ./server/apps/research/models.py

echo -e "\nChecking for existing migrations with Category:"
fd -e py -p ".*_category.*" ./server/apps/research/migrations/

Length of output: 1308


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Category model definition and migrations
echo "Category model definition:"
cat ./server/apps/research/models/category.py

echo -e "\nMigration 0015 content:"
cat ./server/apps/research/migrations/0015_category_slug.py

echo -e "\nMigration 0016 content:"
cat ./server/apps/research/migrations/0016_alter_category_slug.py

Length of output: 2317

server/apps/research/models/category.py (1)

3-4: LGTM! Proper setup for slug handling

The imports and SlugField configuration are well-structured with appropriate constraints.

Also applies to: 9-9

server/apps/research/views.py (1)

105-105: Verify impact on existing URLs

Let's check if there are any existing URLs or references using the old category-based routing.

✅ Verification successful

Category URL implementation is consistent and properly handled

The verification shows that the category-based URL implementation is consistent across the codebase:

  • The URL pattern in urls.py correctly maps to the view method using retrieve_by_category
  • The view implementation includes proper error handling and logging
  • The URL pattern matches the decorator pattern in the review snippet

The changes appear to maintain backward compatibility as both implementations coexist:

  • The new decorator pattern: @action(detail=False, methods=['get'], url_path=r'category/(?P<category_slug>[-\w]+)')
  • The existing URL pattern: r'^api/articles/category/(?P<category>[-\w]+)/$'
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential references to old category URLs in the codebase
echo "Searching for potential references to old category URLs..."
rg -l "category/\w+" --type html --type js --type python

# Search for potential hardcoded category names in tests
echo "Searching for hardcoded category names in tests..."
rg "category.*=.*['\"][\w\s]+['\"]" --type python

Length of output: 414


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential references to old category URLs in the codebase
echo "Searching for potential references to old category URLs..."
rg -l "category/\w+"

# Search for potential hardcoded category names in tests
echo "Searching for hardcoded category names in tests..."
rg "category.*=.*['\"][\w-]+['\"]"

# Look for URL patterns related to categories
echo "Searching for URL patterns with categories..."
rg "url.*category"

# Search for category-related view tests
echo "Searching for category-related tests..."
fd test.*py --exec rg -l "category" {}

Length of output: 858


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation details of the category-related views and tests
echo "Checking category view implementation..."
rg -A 10 "retrieve_by_category" server/apps/research/views.py

echo "Checking URL patterns..."
cat server/apps/research/urls.py

echo "Looking for category-related tests..."
fd "test.*py" -x rg -A 10 "test.*category" {}

# Check for any frontend API calls using these endpoints
echo "Checking frontend API calls..."
rg -l "articles/category" --type js

Length of output: 2486

@losndu losndu merged commit a4ea094 into main Dec 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@losndu losndu mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
@happychuks happychuks deleted the fix/category-url branch December 13, 2024 07:49
This was referenced Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants