Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to Python 3.11 #52

Merged
merged 114 commits into from
Oct 11, 2023
Merged

Upgrade to Python 3.11 #52

merged 114 commits into from
Oct 11, 2023

Conversation

dmichaels-harvard
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- uses: actions/setup-python@v2
with:
python-version: '3.7'
python-version: '3.8'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason not to use 3.11 for CI?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Collaborator

@netsettler netsettler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just the issue about whether to do matrix testing or not. Will should weigh in on that. Otherwise this looks fine.

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ jobs:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- uses: actions/setup-python@v2
with:
python-version: '3.7'
python-version: '3.8'
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the theory here that the actual foursight-<portal> repos will test this enough that we don't need to do all versions? Do the tests for this take a long time? I otherwise think this should maybe have a matrix of 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11. Thoughts, @willronchetti ?

@@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ packages = [
]

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm. There are no classifiers here. I guess we don't have to fix that now. It's of questionable value anyway. But I noticed because I was checking to see if they were updated.

@dmichaels-harvard dmichaels-harvard merged commit eef29c7 into master Oct 11, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants