Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update flame_wave and flame_tube to infer the model's dx #2610

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

zingale
Copy link
Member

@zingale zingale commented Oct 7, 2023

we no longer need to set problem.dx_model but instead can get it from the_amr_ptr

Note: this will change some of the results, since we were not good at keeping the dx_model in inputs files in sync with the resolution.

PR summary

PR motivation

PR checklist

  • test suite needs to be run on this PR
  • this PR will change answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
  • all newly-added functions have docstrings as per the coding conventions
  • the CHANGES file has been updated, if appropriate
  • if appropriate, this change is described in the docs

we no longer need to set problem.dx_model but instead can get it
from the_amr_ptr

Note: this will change some of the results, since we were not
good at keeping the dx_model in inputs files in sync with the
resolution.
@zingale zingale requested a review from yut23 October 7, 2023 22:53
@zingale
Copy link
Member Author

zingale commented Oct 7, 2023

closes #2596

@zingale zingale merged commit bc1af9f into AMReX-Astro:development Oct 9, 2023
18 checks passed
@zingale zingale deleted the update_xrb_dx_model branch October 9, 2023 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants