-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add exhaust or more intense ventilation in the small boxes #69
Comments
Helio on it to bring the exhaustion in the ceiling to inside the box. |
The exhaust is noisy ish, and with a funnel inside the box, it is going to noisier. |
Investigate other fan option or other vaccum lines @HeRodrgues Let's dicuss options. |
I have some ideas, and correctly, I'm just waiting for some components to arrive to test if the concept works. |
Test the ventilation system efficiency with PID with and without |
Is the tubing in the box ready for this test next week? |
We need to switch from the top box to the bottom box, and I left Thanksgiving week open so we could run all the tests needed for the exhaust. |
Is this still relevant or can we close? |
@HeRodrgues please update on what the test results were. |
The tests that @tiffanyona and I ran over a month ago were inconclusive. |
thanks for updating the info here. |
I think until we describe the problem better with the PID, I would close this issue. I will add a point for the olfactory calibration to perform a 1h calibration with continue odor presentation to see if there any substantial building or decrease in the box (this can also help us see if there is a decrease in headspace odor concentration) |
After session is finished, I clearly smell the box. I fear there might be a buildup of odorant as the session progresses.
Further way of assessing it is using the PID and trigger the odor valves and equivalent amount of times while the door is closed #70
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: