You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The idea was that we want the same process to have the same name. But I think many of the names are getting way too granular and we'll never be able to make this scale for external users.
wrt the granularity - I think it's starting to kind of undermine the point of having a standard vocabulary if we're just adding every little variation to general concepts.
I wonder if these process names should be standardized within pipelines rather than in the schema.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
The idea was that we want the same process to have the same name. But I think many of the names are getting way too granular and we'll never be able to make this scale for external users.
wrt the granularity - I think it's starting to kind of undermine the point of having a standard vocabulary if we're just adding every little variation to general concepts.
I wonder if these process names should be standardized within pipelines rather than in the schema.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions