A Machine Learning approach to predict the activities of person.
The Human Activity Recognition database was built from the recordings of 30 study participants performing activities of daily living (ADL) while carrying a waist-mounted smartphone with embedded inertial sensors. The objective is to classify activities into one of the six activities performed.
The experiments have been carried out with a group of 30 volunteers within an age bracket of 19-48 years. Each person performed six activities WALKING
, WALKINGUPSTAIRS
, WALKINGDOWNSTAIRS
, SITTING
, STANDING
, LAYING
wearing a smartphone Samsung Galaxy S II
on the waist. Using its embedded accelerometer and gyroscope, 3-axial linear acceleration and 3-axial angular velocity was captured at a constant rate of 50Hz. The experiments have been video-recorded to label the data manually. The obtained dataset has been randomly partitioned into two sets, where 70% of the volunteers was selected for generating the training data and 30% the test data.
The sensor signals (accelerometer and gyroscope) were pre-processed by applying noise filters and then sampled in fixed-width sliding windows of 2.56 sec and 50% overlap (128 readings/window). The sensor acceleration signal, which has gravitational and body motion components, was separated using a Butterworth low-pass filter into body acceleration and gravity. The gravitational force is assumed to have only low frequency components, therefore a filter with 0.3 Hz cutoff frequency was used. From each window, a vector of features was obtained by calculating variables from the time and frequency domain.
For each record in the dataset the following is provided:
- Triaxial acceleration from the accelerometer (total acceleration) and the estimated body acceleration.
- Triaxial Angular velocity from the gyroscope.
- A 561-feature vector with time and frequency domain variables.
- Its activity label.
- An identifier of the subject who carried out the experiment.
Below is the countplot of the activities performed by all the subjects.
From the above plot we can conclude that the datapoints are somewhat balanced.
Below is the countplot of the activities performed by all the subjects grouped by subjects.
From the above plot we can conclude that a particular subject performs any of the activities more as compared to the other activities.