Update quadplane-parameters.rst SCHED_LOOP_RATE

[timtuxworth]

It seems that 400 should be the recommended SCHED_LOOP_RATE fora aquaplane. If anyone knows more about this please add details.

[timtuxworth]

Perhaps the parameter documentation for SCHED_LOOP_RATE needs updating too?

[Hwurzburg]

@tridge needs to weigh in on this

[tridge]

no, most quadplanes do not need 400. Some very small ones might benefit. The larger the vehicle the less a high loop rate matters, plus the inertia of quadplanes makes their control bandwidth lower so need lower loop rate.
Raising to 400 just leads to larger log files

[timtuxworth]

no, most quadplanes do not need 400. Some very small ones might benefit. The larger the vehicle the less a high loop rate matters, plus the inertia of quadplanes makes their control bandwidth lower so need lower loop rate.
Raising to 400 just leads to larger log files

Would it make sense to say this on the wiki page?

[peterbarker]

no, most quadplanes do not need 400. Some very small ones might benefit. The larger the vehicle the less a high loop rate matters, plus the inertia of quadplanes makes their control bandwidth lower so need lower loop rate.
Raising to 400 just leads to larger log files

Would it make sense to say this on the wiki page?

I think it would - this isn't the first time it's come up. Care to put together a PR?

[timtuxworth]

no, most quadplanes do not need 400. Some very small ones might benefit. The larger the vehicle the less a high loop rate matters, plus the inertia of quadplanes makes their control bandwidth lower so need lower loop rate.
Raising to 400 just leads to larger log files

Would it make sense to say this on the wiki page?

I think it would - this isn't the first time it's come up. Care to put together a PR?

I've updated this PR based on @tridge 's comment above. Will that do, or are you thinking of something more?

[Hwurzburg]

LGTM...will merge once squashed...thanks

[Hwurzburg]

a little editing....squashed...merging...thanks