Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EMSUSD-1619 fix removal on multiple layers #3915

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

pierrebai-adsk
Copy link
Collaborator

When removing multiple layers the removal must not be delayed. This is due to the low-level implementation of layer removal: it uses the parent layer and the index of the sub-layer to be removed instead of its name. When commands are delayed, the index would become incorrect. By not delaying command, the index is properly calculated.

When removing multiple layers the removal must not be delayed. This is due to the low-level implementation of layer removal: it uses the parent layer and the index of the sub-layer to be removed instead of its name. Wehn commands are delayed, the index would become incorrect. By not delaying command, the index is properly calculated.
@pierrebai-adsk pierrebai-adsk added bug Something isn't working adsk Related to Autodesk plugin labels Sep 13, 2024
@pierrebai-adsk pierrebai-adsk self-assigned this Sep 13, 2024
@pierrebai-adsk pierrebai-adsk added the ready-for-merge Development process is finished, PR is ready for merge label Sep 13, 2024
@seando-adsk seando-adsk added workflows Related to in-context workflows and removed bug Something isn't working adsk Related to Autodesk plugin labels Sep 18, 2024
@seando-adsk seando-adsk merged commit 9d770c0 into dev Sep 18, 2024
11 checks passed
@seando-adsk seando-adsk deleted the bailp/EMSUSD-1619/remove-anon-layers branch September 18, 2024 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge Development process is finished, PR is ready for merge workflows Related to in-context workflows
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants