-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modify Acceptance Criteria Infrastructure to Summarize Assignment of On-board Survey #142
Conversation
skip ci
@lmz, @gregerhardt, @FlaviaTsang Per our call today, here are some distance summaries. Note two caveats: (1) we are using the midday roadway distance skim and (2) the skims are composite paths, so the walk trips are those with no probability of taking transit (there are others for which walking is part of the composite path).
And then the same three summaries for observed trips that start and end in SF.
To me, this strengthens the case to force a transit boarding, as the 25th percentile walk distance is greater than one mile. |
Force Transit Boarding in Path Builder (i.e., prohibit walk-all-the-way paths)
- skip-ci
@AshishKuls fyi new crosswalk files
…yAreaMetro/tm2py into add_on_board_assign_summaries
the produced file is used for acceptance criteria summaries
What existing problem does the pull request solve and why should we include it?
The existing Acceptance Criteria infrastructure include numerous methods for summarizing observed and simulated data. Here, minor adjustments are made to facilitate the comparison of outcomes from the assignment of the on-board survey data to observed data.
What is the testing plan?
Make sure core Acceptance Criteria summaries are not disturbed by the changes.
Demonstrate the code is solid by discussing how results are verified and covered by tests
Code formatting
Code should be PEP8 compliant before merging by running a package like
black
Applicable Issues
None