Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Persistent cohort result format update #92

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Persistent cohort result format update #92

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hugy718
Copy link
Collaborator

@hugy718 hugy718 commented Aug 20, 2022

This branch is used for the development of a new cohort result format:

  • interface with the new cohort processor and its in-memory result format Rebuild cohort processing #72
  • cublet-wise cohort description to address the removal of global id at cube level Add cube meta #75
  • used for development to enable cohort processing with an input cohort (thus funnel analysis)
  • used for cohort export (create a new cube of a cohort from the original cube)

I will push the initial commits here in the next two days

@hugy718 hugy718 marked this pull request as draft August 20, 2022 07:45
@hugy718 hugy718 changed the base branch from main to dev August 20, 2022 13:29
@KimballCai KimballCai added the structure-adjust Adjust project structure or internal data structure label Aug 30, 2022
@NLGithubWP NLGithubWP force-pushed the persistent-cohort-result-format-update branch from 02dd89d to 4576e5f Compare September 18, 2022 14:16
@KimballCai
Copy link
Contributor

please track pr #106

@KimballCai KimballCai closed this Sep 20, 2022
@NLGithubWP NLGithubWP deleted the persistent-cohort-result-format-update branch December 12, 2022 05:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
structure-adjust Adjust project structure or internal data structure
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@hugy718 @KimballCai