Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revision 3 of the CMOD model for the default ISS #201

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DaveBowman2001
Copy link
Contributor

@DaveBowman2001 DaveBowman2001 commented Sep 3, 2024

Solar Arrays rotated 90 degrees perpendicular to the station's main body. Replaces the current CMOD model (Revision 2) first introduced in PR #91
image
Sample screenshot

Solar Arrays rotated 90 degrees perpendicular to the station's main body
@ajtribick
Copy link
Contributor

Do you know what the license/copyright is for this model, so we can create the .license file?

@DaveBowman2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

DaveBowman2001 commented Sep 3, 2024

Do you know what the license/copyright is for this model, so we can create the .license file?

Here's the note left by Andrew Farnaby, the original author, from the defunct Project Alpha site
IMG_20240904_073931

...and we have this written on its SSC file (as of 2022-Nov-5):
IMG_20240904_074117

@ajtribick
Copy link
Contributor

ajtribick commented Sep 5, 2024

Ok so I think that helps cover the copyright side of things. Licensing seems a bit more problematic - according to that description it looks like it's ok to use in Orbiter, but we aren't Orbiter.

As I see it, the options are:

  • Contact Andrew Farnaby and Bob Hundley and confirm what license we could use their work under
  • Start from scratch
  • Remove the ISS add-on from the Celestia distribution

@DaveBowman2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was wondering when did Andrew Farnaby's ProjectAlpha ISS became a part of Celestia's default installation. Before I made my changes with #91 and #201, a variant of it from the Motherlode was the default one for more than a decade afaik as evident from this SSC intro:
IMG_20240905_163644
satellites_ISS_June_2008_1__krisci3

@DaveBowman2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

As I see it, the options are:

  • Contact Andrew Farnaby and Bob Hundley and confirm what license we could use their work under

I wish I knew what their present-day profiles are directly. As for Bob Hundley, I am not quite certain if he is bh on the Celestia Forums (he did say he was one of the authors of some old Shuttle models for NASA which became the basis of my own shuttle addon, hence my indirect clue of his identity)

@DaveBowman2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

DaveBowman2001 commented Sep 6, 2024

@ajtribick here's our previous Discord conversation with @SevenSpheres and @pedro-fixingstuff last year, regarding the licensing for the default ISS when I made my previous modification on #91:

Me: "Regarding the default ISS model from #celestia-general and #celestia-pictures, here's the status of the modified Alpha model that will replace the stock model. There's still a lot of work to do, as some modules that were launched are in wrong positions (like Tranquility and Cupola)"
unknown

7Sph: "Where is this model from? Do you know anything about the licensing?"

Me: "Stage 13. For context, here's the ISS addon that became the stock model from 1.6.0 above (krisci3)"

Pedro: "Bob Hundley tells us the model is originally from Andrew Farnaby"

7Sph: "Yes, it looks like both the Space Station Alpha model and the default ISS model are derived from the same model by Andrew Farnaby. I guess that means we can assume CC BY-SA compatible licensing?"

Me: "Well, technically yes"

7Sph: "If you're making modifications to the model anyway, why not start with the default 2008 model instead of an older one?"

Me: "The original model is obviously more complete than the 2008 model, and it's much easier to work with as I'll just remove the cancelled modules and relocate some of them"

@SevenSpheres
Copy link
Contributor

I think at that point I was assuming that the default ISS model was under a suitable license, which now seems uncertain.

Copy link
Contributor

@ajtribick ajtribick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So summarising the state of the discussions, I think that without licensing confirmation we cannot continue to use the Orbiter Project Alpha model or its derivatives - and so far I haven't seen any way to contact the original author Andrew Farnaby. I'm therefore suggesting removal of the ISS add-on (#202) as the immediate fix for the licensing issue.

@DaveBowman2001 DaveBowman2001 mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2024
@ajtribick
Copy link
Contributor

As mentioned on #202 it doesn't seem anyone's aware of a usable license for the original model from which this is derived, so I'm going to close this for now. If more information comes up in the future, I would have no problems with re-adding.

@ajtribick ajtribick closed this Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants