to make idempotency more explicit in CAIP25 #184
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: bumblefudge <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bumblefudge <[email protected]>
4 tasks
added 2 commits
November 24, 2022 14:48
Signed-off-by: bumblefudge <[email protected]>
bumblefudge
added
the
14-day merge
hmalik88
reviewed
Dec 7, 2022
Co-authored-by: Hassan Malik <[email protected]>
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Making dependence on CAIP-171 more explicit as per last RPC meeting and hopefully closes #143 unless there are corner-cases to be considered or error-messages to be added?
Signed-off-by: bumblefudge [email protected]