Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

将 @node-rs/jieba 更改为 WASM 版本以实现 0 占用规范 #343

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

Hoshino-Yumetsuki
Copy link
Contributor

@Hoshino-Yumetsuki Hoshino-Yumetsuki commented Dec 28, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Dependencies

    • Replaced text segmentation library from @node-rs/jieba to jieba-wasm
    • Updated text processing dependency to version ^2.2.0
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced text segmentation functionality with new library implementation
    • Revised approach to calculating similarity scores for improved accuracy

Hoshino-Yumetsuki and others added 2 commits December 29, 2024 00:02
…t segmentation

- Updated the dependency from `@node-rs/jieba` to `jieba-wasm` in package.json.
- Refactored the text segmentation logic in `similarity.ts` to utilize the new `cut` function from `jieba-wasm`, enhancing compatibility and performance.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updating the text segmentation library in the koishi-plugin-chatluna-long-memory package. The project has replaced the @node-rs/jieba dependency with jieba-wasm in both the package.json and the source code. This change modifies how Chinese text is tokenized, switching from the Node.js-specific Jieba implementation to a WebAssembly-based version.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/long-memory/package.json Replaced @node-rs/jieba@^2.0.1 with jieba-wasm@^2.2.0 in dependencies
packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts Updated import from @node-rs/jieba to jieba-wasm, modified text segmentation method to use cut() instead of jieba.cut(); changes to calculateBM25Similarity method with new variables and logic

Poem

🐰 Jieba's dance, a new WebAssembly stage
Text tokens leap with a lighter gauge
From Node to WASM, segmentation takes flight
A rabbit's code hops with pure delight!
Swift and nimble, words now break free 🔤

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts (1)

80-80: Consider adding error-handling for segmentation.

When invoking cut, if the input text is malformed or the WASM module encounters an error, there may be no graceful fallback. If failure is expected to be rare, at least consider capturing exceptions or employing a fallback segmentation method for critical paths.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a273d87 and 6819156.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/long-memory/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts (1)

1-1: Use caution with the new WASM import.

Switching from a native library to a WASM-based approach is typically safe, but confirm that the WASM module is properly loaded and initialized. Some WASM libraries require async setup routines or additional steps before calling cut. Verify any necessary initialization steps for your environment to avoid potential runtime errors.

packages/long-memory/package.json (1)

52-52: Validate version constraints for jieba-wasm.

The new dependency "jieba-wasm": "^2.2.0" looks correct. However, ensure that any potential vulnerabilities or major bug fixes are addressed by pinning or upgrading to the latest patch version if necessary.

…ity.ts

- Improved the BM25 similarity calculation by introducing term frequency maps for both documents.
- Added a smoothing factor and adjusted the scoring formula to normalize against the theoretical maximum score.
- Enhanced code readability and maintainability by restructuring the logic for term frequency and IDF calculations.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts (1)

Missing test coverage for critical text similarity functionality

The codebase analysis reveals that there are no test files for the TextTokenizer and SimilarityCalculator classes in the packages/long-memory package. This is concerning given the recent changes:

  1. Integration of WASM-based tokenization with jieba-wasm
  2. Multi-language support (Chinese, Japanese, English)
  3. Implementation of BM25 similarity calculation
  4. Complex text processing and similarity calculations

Test coverage is essential for:

  • Validating the WASM tokenization accuracy
  • Ensuring correct language detection and processing
  • Verifying similarity calculations (cosine, levenshtein, jaccard, BM25)
  • Edge cases handling (empty strings, mixed languages, special characters)
  • Weight validation and normalization
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-231: Verify test coverage for the updated implementation.

Please ensure that the test suite covers:

  1. WASM-based tokenization with various input types
  2. BM25 similarity calculation with the new implementation
  3. Edge cases with empty strings and different languages

Let's check for existing tests:


Let's also check the actual implementation to see what we need to test:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files covering similarity functionality
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts similarity

Length of output: 37


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for test files
fd test -e ts

# Also search for similarity-related test patterns using ripgrep
rg -l "describe.*Similar|test.*Similar|similarity" --type ts

Length of output: 653


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similarity-related class and function implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class SimilarityCalculator {
  $$$
}'

# Search for test patterns in the codebase
rg "TextTokenizer|SimilarityCalculator" -A 5 --type ts

Length of output: 16452


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for test files in the long-memory package specifically
fd test -e ts -p packages/long-memory/

# Let's also check for any test files that might have been moved or renamed
rg -l "describe.*TextTokenizer|test.*TextTokenizer|describe.*Similarity|test.*Similarity" --type ts packages/long-memory/

# Let's check if there are any test files in __tests__ directory
fd . packages/long-memory/__tests__/

Length of output: 322

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts (1)

189-231: Enhance BM25 implementation efficiency and accuracy.

The BM25 implementation has been improved with proper smoothing and normalization. However, there are opportunities for optimization:

  1. Document Length Calculation:
-const avgDocLength = (doc1Length + doc2Length) / 2
+const avgDocLength = Math.max(doc1Length, doc2Length)
  1. Document Frequency:
-const docFreq = (termFreqDoc2.get(term) || 0) > 0 ? 1 : 0
+const docFreq = ((termFreqDoc1.get(term) || 0) > 0 ? 1 : 0) + ((termFreqDoc2.get(term) || 0) > 0 ? 1 : 0)
  1. Performance Optimization:
-const uniqueTerms = new Set([...tokens1, ...tokens2])
+const uniqueTerms = new Set(tokens1)
 
 tokens1.forEach((token) => {
     termFreqDoc1.set(token, (termFreqDoc1.get(token) || 0) + 1)
 })
 
 tokens2.forEach((token) => {
     termFreqDoc2.set(token, (termFreqDoc2.get(token) || 0) + 1
+    uniqueTerms.add(token)
 })
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6819156 and b845b73.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM! Verify WASM initialization.

The switch to jieba-wasm aligns with the PR objective. The implementation maintains the same interface, ensuring compatibility.

Let's verify if there are any WASM initialization requirements that need to be handled:

Also applies to: 80-80

✅ Verification successful

Let me search specifically for jieba-wasm initialization patterns.


Let me check if there are any initialization requirements in the jieba-wasm package by looking at its usage in the codebase.


No initialization required for jieba-wasm

Based on the usage patterns found in the codebase, the jieba-wasm package is being used directly through the cut function without any explicit initialization requirements. The function is imported and used straightforwardly in the tokenization process, suggesting that any necessary WASM initialization is handled internally by the package.

  • The only usage is in packages/long-memory/src/similarity.ts:80 where cut is called directly
  • No initialization patterns or setup code is present or required
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for jieba-wasm initialization patterns in the codebase
rg -l "initJieba|init\(\)" --type ts

Length of output: 1304


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for jieba-wasm initialization patterns
rg -A 5 "jieba-wasm" --type ts

Length of output: 418


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the usage of cut function from jieba-wasm
ast-grep --pattern 'cut($$$)'

Length of output: 126

@dingyi222666 dingyi222666 merged commit 05f516b into ChatLunaLab:v1-dev Dec 28, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants