-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Combine Project Explorer and Editor into a Single Interface (#198) #199
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Combine Project Explorer and Editor into a Single Interface (#198) #199
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
7f9a041
to
6b306ab
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
@SwapnilChand let me know once you push the updates to this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
const handleFileClick = (node: FileNode) => { | ||
const fullPath = getNodeFullPath(fileTree, node.id); | ||
if (!fullPath) { | ||
console.error('Could not find full path for node'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential exposure of sensitive information in console logs.
Solution: Avoid logging sensitive information and consider using a logging library that can manage log levels and outputs.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
console.error('Could not find full path for node'); | |
// Log only necessary information, avoid sensitive data. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
const API_URL = | ||
process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_API_URL || 'http://localhost:3001'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential exposure of sensitive data in API responses.
Solution: Review API responses to ensure no sensitive information is leaked. Implement validation and sanitization on both the client and server sides.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const API_URL = | |
process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_API_URL || 'http://localhost:3001'; | |
const API_URL = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_API_URL || 'http://localhost:3001'; // Ensure sensitive data is not exposed |
Take a look. Though there are a few errors you see even though a new file is created, when you don't have a _meta.json for a folder. This code also doesnt have the logic to create a _meta.json when you create a new folder / also creating a new folder sometimes breaks. |
Other than UI the focus is on the addNewItem method, which earlier would create a folder but wont be able to save it locally. And now file creation works but not folder. |
@shreyashkgupta can you have a look at this and test it out. @SwapnilChand can you list all the times it breaks, would like to avoid bugs if we can fix them before pushing any updates! |
We can't create a folder and adding an extension while creating a new file is essential as of now. With this code rest of the stuff works fine |
c3b4fd9
to
1adb25e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
export async function POST(request: Request) { | ||
try { | ||
const { path: filePath, content } = await request.json() | ||
const fullPath = path.join(getBasePath(), filePath) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential exposure of sensitive file paths.
Solution: Implement validation and sanitization for file paths to prevent directory traversal attacks.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const fullPath = path.join(getBasePath(), filePath) | |
const sanitizedPath = path.normalize(filePath).replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, ''); const fullPath = path.join(getBasePath(), sanitizedPath); |
} | ||
|
||
// Check file type | ||
if (!ALLOWED_FILE_TYPES.has(file.type)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: File upload security checks
Solution: Implement additional security checks for uploaded files, such as virus scanning and validating file content.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
if (!ALLOWED_FILE_TYPES.has(file.type)) { | |
if (!ALLOWED_FILE_TYPES.has(file.type) || !isValidFileContent(file)){ |
const bytes = await file.arrayBuffer() | ||
const buffer = Buffer.from(bytes) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: File reading performance
Solution: Consider using a more efficient method to read the file directly into a buffer.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const bytes = await file.arrayBuffer() | |
const buffer = Buffer.from(bytes) | |
const buffer = await file.arrayBuffer(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
export async function POST(request: Request) { | ||
try { | ||
const { path: filePath, content } = await request.json() | ||
const fullPath = path.join(getBasePath(), filePath) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential security risk with file path handling.
Solution: Sanitize and validate all user inputs for file paths to prevent directory traversal vulnerabilities.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const fullPath = path.join(getBasePath(), filePath) | |
const safeFilePath = path.normalize(filePath).replace(/^\.+|\.+$/g, ''); const fullPath = path.join(getBasePath(), safeFilePath); |
const filename = request.nextUrl.searchParams.get('filename') | ||
if (!filename) { | ||
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'No filename provided' }, { status: 400 }) | ||
} | ||
|
||
const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', filename) | ||
await unlink(editorPublicPath) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential file path traversal vulnerability in DELETE
route
Solution: Validate the filename
parameter to ensure it only contains valid and expected characters. Consider using a library like path.join()
to safely construct the file path.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const filename = request.nextUrl.searchParams.get('filename') | |
if (!filename) { | |
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'No filename provided' }, { status: 400 }) | |
} | |
const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', filename) | |
await unlink(editorPublicPath) | |
[LINE 100][UPDATED] const filename = request.nextUrl.searchParams.get('filename') | |
[LINE 101][UPDATED] if (!filename){ | |
[LINE 102][UPDATED] return NextResponse.json({error: 'No filename provided'},{status: 400}) | |
[LINE 103][UPDATED]} | |
[LINE 105][UPDATED] const sanitizedFilename = path.basename(filename, path.extname(filename)).replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9-_]/g, '_'); | |
[LINE 106][UPDATED] const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', sanitizedFilename); | |
[LINE 107][UPDATED] await unlink(editorPublicPath) |
const FileExplorer = dynamic(() => import("@/components/file-explorer"), { | ||
ssr: false, | ||
}); | ||
const Editor = dynamic(() => import("@/components/editor"), { ssr: false }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential performance impact from dynamic imports
Solution: Consider using server-side rendering (SSR) or preloading the dynamic components to improve performance, especially for repeat visits.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const FileExplorer = dynamic(() => import("@/components/file-explorer"), { | |
ssr: false, | |
}); | |
const Editor = dynamic(() => import("@/components/editor"), { ssr: false }); | |
[LINE 10][UPDATED] const FileExplorer = dynamic(() => import("@/components/file-explorer"),{ | |
[LINE 11][UPDATED] ssr: true, | |
[LINE 12][UPDATED]}); | |
[LINE 13][UPDATED] const Editor = dynamic(() => import("@/components/editor"),{ssr: true}); | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
} | ||
|
||
return NextResponse.json( | ||
{ error: 'Failed to generate AI content', details: error }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential exposure of sensitive information in error responses.
Solution: Sanitize error messages before sending them to the client. Avoid exposing internal error details.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
{ error: 'Failed to generate AI content', details: error }, | |
return NextResponse.json({error: 'Failed to generate AI content'},{status: 500}) |
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'No filename provided' }, { status: 400 }) | ||
} | ||
|
||
const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', filename) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential file path traversal vulnerability in DELETE
route
Solution: Validate the filename
parameter to ensure it only contains allowed characters and does not attempt to access files outside the intended directory. Consider using a more secure method to identify the file to be deleted, such as a unique identifier stored in the database.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', filename) | |
const allowedFilename = path.basename(filename, path.extname(filename)).replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9-_]/g, ''); | |
const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', allowedFilename + path.extname(filename)); |
const FileExplorer = dynamic(() => import("@/components/file-explorer"), { | ||
ssr: false, | ||
}); | ||
const Editor = dynamic(() => import("@/components/editor"), { ssr: false }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential performance impact from dynamic imports
Solution: Consider using server-side rendering (SSR) or preloading the dynamic imports to improve overall performance. Alternatively, you could explore code splitting strategies to optimize the bundle size and loading times.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const FileExplorer = dynamic(() => import("@/components/file-explorer"), { | |
ssr: false, | |
}); | |
const Editor = dynamic(() => import("@/components/editor"), { ssr: false }); | |
import FileExplorer from "@/components/file-explorer"; | |
import Editor from "@/components/editor"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
const messages = [ | ||
{ | ||
role: "system", | ||
content: `${blockPrompt.system}\n\nExpected output format: ${blockPrompt.format}\n\nDo not include any explanations or markdown formatting in the response.` | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
role: "user", | ||
content: `Rewrite the following ${blockType} content in a ${style} style while maintaining its structure:\n\n${content}` | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential security vulnerability in packages/create-app/editor/src/app/api/rewrite/route.ts
Solution: Sanitize the user input before using it in the system prompt. Use a library like DOMPurify
to sanitize the input and prevent potential injection attacks.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const messages = [ | |
{ | |
role: "system", | |
content: `${blockPrompt.system}\n\nExpected output format: ${blockPrompt.format}\n\nDo not include any explanations or markdown formatting in the response.` | |
}, | |
{ | |
role: "user", | |
content: `Rewrite the following ${blockType} content in a ${style} style while maintaining its structure:\n\n${content}` | |
} | |
const messages =[ | |
{ | |
role: "system", | |
content: `${blockPrompt.system} | |
Expected output format: ${blockPrompt.format} | |
Do not include any explanations or markdown formatting in the response.` | |
}, | |
{ | |
role: "user", | |
content: `Rewrite the following content in a ${DOMPurify.sanitize(style)}style while maintaining its structure: | |
${DOMPurify.sanitize(content)}` | |
} | |
]; |
const maxRetries = 3; | ||
for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++) { | ||
try { | ||
const jsonContent = JSON.stringify(content, null, 2) | ||
await writeFile(fullPath, jsonContent, 'utf-8') | ||
return NextResponse.json({ success: true }) | ||
} catch (writeError) { | ||
if (i === maxRetries - 1) throw writeError; | ||
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000)); // Wait 1s before retry | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential performance issue in packages/create-app/editor/src/app/api/files/route.ts
Solution: Consider reducing the delay between retries or implementing an exponential backoff strategy to improve the overall performance of the file write operation.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const maxRetries = 3; | |
for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++) { | |
try { | |
const jsonContent = JSON.stringify(content, null, 2) | |
await writeFile(fullPath, jsonContent, 'utf-8') | |
return NextResponse.json({ success: true }) | |
} catch (writeError) { | |
if (i === maxRetries - 1) throw writeError; | |
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000)); // Wait 1s before retry | |
} | |
for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++){ | |
try{ | |
const jsonContent = JSON.stringify(content, null, 2); | |
await writeFile(fullPath, jsonContent, 'utf-8'); | |
return NextResponse.json({success: true}); | |
}catch (writeError){ | |
if (i === maxRetries - 1) throw writeError; | |
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 500)); // Wait 500ms before retry | |
} | |
} |
🔍 Code Review Summary❗ Attention Required: This push has potential issues. 🚨 Overview
🚨 Critical Issuessecurity (2 issues)1. Potential file path traversal vulnerability.📁 File: packages/create-app/editor/src/app/api/upload/route.ts 💡 Solution: Current Code: const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', filename) Suggested Code: const sanitizedFilename = path.basename(filename); const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', sanitizedFilename); 2. Potential performance issue with large file uploads.📁 File: packages/create-app/editor/src/app/api/upload/route.ts 💡 Solution: Current Code: const bytes = await file.arrayBuffer(); const buffer = Buffer.from(bytes); Suggested Code: const stream = file.stream(); const buffer = await streamToBuffer(stream); // Implement streamToBuffer to handle streaming. Test Cases16 file need updates to their tests. Run
Useful Commands
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'No filename provided' }, { status: 400 }) | ||
} | ||
|
||
const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', filename) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential file path traversal vulnerability.
Solution: Sanitize user input for filenames to prevent directory traversal.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', filename) | |
const sanitizedFilename = path.basename(filename); const editorPublicPath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', sanitizedFilename); |
const bytes = await file.arrayBuffer() | ||
const buffer = Buffer.from(bytes) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment: Potential performance issue with large file uploads.
Solution: Consider streaming file uploads instead of loading them entirely into memory.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!
const bytes = await file.arrayBuffer() | |
const buffer = Buffer.from(bytes) | |
const stream = file.stream(); const buffer = await streamToBuffer(stream); // Implement streamToBuffer to handle streaming. |
Audio Block Component
Provide a reusable audio block component for the editor application.
This component enhances the editor's capabilities by enabling users to easily incorporate audio content into their documents, improving the overall multimedia experience.
Original Description
# Implement File Management and AI-Powered Content Rewriting**
This pull request adds file management capabilities and AI-powered content rewriting functionality to the editor application.
**
These changes will enable users to manage their files within the editor and leverage AI-powered content rewriting to optimize their content. This will improve the overall editing experience and productivity for users.
Original Description
# Implement File Management and AI-Powered Content Rewriting**
**
This pull request adds file management capabilities and an AI-powered content rewriting feature to the editor application.
**
**
These changes will allow users to manage their project files and leverage AI-powered content rewriting to improve their content. The addition of audio support and a responsive layout will enhance the overall editor experience.
Original Description
# Initial Setup for Next.js Editor Application**
**
**
Establish a new Next.js editor application with essential configurations and components.
**
**
**
This PR lays the foundation for a functional editor application, enabling file management and user interaction through a clean UI.
Original Description
# Improve Editor Functionality**
**
**
**
Enhance the functionality and user experience of the Next.js-based editor application.
**
**
**
**
These changes significantly improve the editor's capabilities, making it more versatile and user-friendly for content creation and management tasks.
Original Description
# Refactor Editor and File Management Components**
**
**
**
**
This pull request refactors the editor and file management components to enhance functionality and improve code organization.
Editor
component that supports drag-and-drop functionality.FileExplorer
component for better file management and navigation, with a context menu for file operations (create, delete).**
**
**
**
**
These changes streamline the editing process and enhance the overall user interface, making file management more intuitive.
Original Description
# Comprehensive Editor Improvements**
**
**
**
**
**
Enhance the editor's functionality, streamline the user experience, and introduce new UI components for improved interactivity.
@anthropic-ai/sdk
,@google/generative-ai
,@radix-ui/react-context-menu
, andreact-resizable-panels
.page.tsx
file to redirect to/editmode
and removed the previous article editing logic.EditModePage
component that integrates a resizable file explorer and editor.Editor
component for editing file content with drag-and-drop support for blocks.react-resizable-panels
library, allowing for vertical and horizontal resizing of panels.**
**
**
**
**
**
These changes significantly improve the editor's capabilities, streamline the user experience, and introduce new UI components that will enable more advanced and interactive interfaces within the editor application.
Original Description
# Editor Enhancements**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Introduce new dependencies, refactor the editor's file management and UI components, and enhance the editor's functionality with new features.
@anthropic-ai/sdk
,@google/generative-ai
, andreact-resizable-panels
.**
**
**
**
**
**
**
These changes improve the editor's functionality and user interface, making it more efficient and user-friendly, and providing users with a more robust and user-friendly content management experience.
Original Description
# Comprehensive Enhancements to AkiraDocs**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Integrate AI capabilities and improve documentation clarity and usability across the AkiraDocs platform.
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
These enhancements significantly improve user onboarding, documentation clarity, and API usability, while streamlining the documentation process through AI integration.
Original Description
## 🔍 Description Combines project explorer and the editor ## Type - [ ] 🐛 Bug Fix - [-] ✨ Feature - [ ] 📚 Documentation - [ ] 🔧 Other: _____Checklist