Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: Auto-create unit tests for changes in PR #600 #628

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kaizen-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizen-bot kaizen-bot bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Comprehensive Unit Test Suite and Enhancements to Work Summary and PR Description Generation

  • Purpose:
    Introduce a robust set of unit tests to validate the code review process functionality, and improve the work summary and pull request description generation capabilities.
  • Key Changes:
    • Added comprehensive unit tests for the main function, process_pr function, save_review function, LLMProvider class, and helper functions.
    • Updated the date range in main.py from 7 to 14 days for broader data capture.
    • Added a new prompt for merging multiple work summaries in work_summary_prompts.py.
    • Introduced a standardized output format for PR descriptions in pr_desc_prompts.py.
    • Refactored PRDescriptionGenerator to streamline the description generation process.
    • Added unit tests for LLMProvider and code chunking functionality.
  • Impact:
    These changes will enhance code reliability and maintainability by ensuring critical functionalities are thoroughly tested, while also improving the clarity and usability of generated summaries and descriptions, aiding developers in understanding changes more effectively.

✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Original Description These tests were generated based on changes in PR #600

Copy link
Contributor Author

kaizen-bot bot commented Oct 21, 2024

🔍 Code Review Summary

Attention Required: This push has potential issues. 🚨

Overview

  • Total Feedbacks: 1 (Critical: 1, Refinements: 0)
  • Files Affected: 1
  • Code Quality: [███████████████░░░░░] 75% (Fair)

🚨 Critical Issues

security (1 issues)

1. Potential for sensitive data exposure in test logs.


📁 File: .kaizen/unit_test/.experiments/code_review/test_main.py
🔍 Reasoning:
Logging sensitive information can lead to security vulnerabilities.

💡 Solution:
Ensure that sensitive data is not logged during tests.

Current Code:

mock_logger.info.assert_called_with("All PRs processed successfully")

Suggested Code:

    mock_logger.info.assert_called_with("All PRs processed successfully") # Ensure no sensitive data is included

Test Cases

3 file need updates to their tests. Run !unittest to generate create and update tests.


✨ Generated with love by Kaizen ❤️

Useful Commands
  • Feedback: Share feedback on kaizens performance with !feedback [your message]
  • Ask PR: Reply with !ask-pr [your question]
  • Review: Reply with !review
  • Update Tests: Reply with !unittest to create a PR with test changes

Copy link
Contributor Author

@kaizen-bot kaizen-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider implementing the following changes to improve the code.


assert mock_process_pr.call_count == 2
assert mock_save_review.call_count == 2
mock_logger.info.assert_called_with("All PRs processed successfully")
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment: Potential for sensitive data exposure in test logs.

Solution: Ensure that sensitive data is not logged during tests.
!! Make sure the following suggestion is correct before committing it !!

Suggested change
mock_logger.info.assert_called_with("All PRs processed successfully")
mock_logger.info.assert_called_with("All PRs processed successfully") # Ensure no sensitive data is included

@kaizen-bot kaizen-bot bot requested a review from sauravpanda October 21, 2024 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants