-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(llmobs): support annotating primitive prompt templates #10677
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 tasks
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 100 Passed, 850 Skipped, 1m 15.6s Total duration (13m 18.84s time saved) |
|
Yun-Kim
reviewed
Sep 17, 2024
releasenotes/notes/support-prompt-annotations-b8e406261197f61a.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Yun-Kim
reviewed
Sep 19, 2024
releasenotes/notes/support-prompt-annotations-b8e406261197f61a.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
….yaml Co-authored-by: Yun Kim <[email protected]>
Yun-Kim
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2024
mabdinur
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2024
Support the ability for users to annotate prompt template data via the annotate function. Users can pass in two types of objects as a prompt - a dictionary that adheres to our `Prompt` typed dict - importing `ddtrace.llmobs.utils.Prompt` and passing in the `Prompt` typed dict Follow up: be able to pass in prompt template data to annotation_context ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Co-authored-by: lievan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yun Kim <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Support the ability for users to annotate prompt template data via the annotate function.
Users can pass in two types of objects as a prompt
Prompt
typed dictddtrace.llmobs.utils.Prompt
and passing in thePrompt
typed dictFollow up: be able to pass in prompt template data to annotation_context
Checklist
Reviewer Checklist