Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(crashtracking): add python version to crashtracker tags [backport 2.13] #10733

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Backport fe5b42f from #10720 to 2.13.

During escalations it's currently difficult to find the exact Python version relevant for a defect. This is a simple fix for that.

I'm recommending a backport because

  1. The fix is simple
  2. 2.11 and onward introduce crashtracker, and we're still dealing with crashes from those versions

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

During escalations it's currently difficult to find the exact Python
version relevant for a defect. This is a simple fix for that.

I'm recommending a backport because
1. The fix is simple
2. 2.11 and onward introduce crashtracker, and we're still dealing with
crashes from those versions

## Checklist
- [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

## Reviewer Checklist
- [X] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

(cherry picked from commit fe5b42f)
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2024 21:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added the changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. label Sep 19, 2024
@taegyunkim taegyunkim closed this Sep 19, 2024
@taegyunkim taegyunkim reopened this Sep 19, 2024
@taegyunkim taegyunkim enabled auto-merge (squash) September 19, 2024 21:30
Copy link
Contributor Author

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

ddtrace/internal/core/crashtracking.py                                  @DataDog/apm-core-python

@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-10720-to-2.13
Commit report: af03f11
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 9081 Passed, 1267 Skipped, 2h 12m 57.97s Total duration (7m 19.41s time saved)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-10-30 16:45:16

Comparing candidate commit af03f11 in PR branch backport-10720-to-2.13 with baseline commit bb4e3f2 in branch 2.13.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 285 metrics, 47 unstable metrics.

@taegyunkim taegyunkim merged commit fa0948f into 2.13 Oct 30, 2024
498 of 499 checks passed
@taegyunkim taegyunkim deleted the backport-10720-to-2.13 branch October 30, 2024 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants