Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add JARVIS example. #100

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add JARVIS example. #100

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

knc6
Copy link

@knc6 knc6 commented Feb 2, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@@ -1,137 +1,749 @@
{
Copy link
Member

@timurbazhirov timurbazhirov Mar 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #22.    Poscar(hetero).write_file(filename)

We could consider moving this to a separate function later on, perhaps inside jarvis tools? Creating a heterostructure seems like a good repeatable use case. Of course, there are many nuances to the implementation.


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -1,137 +1,749 @@
{
Copy link
Member

@timurbazhirov timurbazhirov Mar 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #7.    def atoms_to_job(name='interface-670-664', atoms=[],workflow=[]):

What would be a good signature for this function eventually?


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -1,137 +1,749 @@
{
Copy link
Member

@timurbazhirov timurbazhirov Mar 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was there also a part where we extracted the properties, by chance?


Reply via ReviewNB

@timurbazhirov
Copy link
Member

@knc6 - added a few comments to the notebook via ReviewNB.

@timurbazhirov
Copy link
Member

@knc6 I took the changes in this PR and incorporated them in #99

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants