Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for mesoscale forcing capabilities #955

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 6, 2024

Conversation

ewquon
Copy link
Contributor

@ewquon ewquon commented Jan 11, 2024

This PR documents the mesoscale-to-microscale coupling strategies that were introduced by #652. These strategies provide mesoscale forcing through source terms based on:

  1. Tendencies (or mesoscale budget components)
  2. Profile assimilation — generalized to include "direct" and "indirect" forcing schemes, applied to the full simulation domain or a portion thereof.

@marchdf
Copy link
Contributor

marchdf commented Jan 11, 2024

Thank you for doing this! One suggestion I might have is to refer to this documentation in the "theory manual" part of the documentation:https://exawind.github.io/amr-wind/theory/theory.html#source-terms We have a section there on GravityForcing in the "source terms" section. Just a short section/sentence with a cross reference of sort would probably be plenty.

@ewquon
Copy link
Contributor Author

ewquon commented Jan 11, 2024

Good suggestion! I'll add some text shortly.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2024

This PR is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.

@mbkuhn
Copy link
Contributor

mbkuhn commented Mar 4, 2024

Planning to merge this PR when the other one gets merged because I'm assuming this corresponds to the changes in the other PR. If I'm mistaken on that, I could merge this one first.

@mbkuhn mbkuhn merged commit a6f745d into Exawind:main Mar 6, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants