Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for from PR #18 + credentials directory #23

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

chen23
Copy link
Contributor

@chen23 chen23 commented Apr 25, 2019

Includes #18

Also updates “stable” template

Adds “credentials directory” for secrets (new default)

Pete Brown and others added 7 commits September 12, 2018 08:23
Problem:
With the current Chart RBAC resource names are hard coded and not optional
so it's impossible to deploy more than one instance in a namespace

Solution:
This uses the helper f5-bigip-ctlr.fullname as the name of each resource to it's unique.
It also add variables to make the RBAc resources optional.
You can also set the name of the service account to use so you can use it across all deploys.

Testing (optional if not described in Solution section): Description of tests that were run to exercise the solutions (unit tests, system tests, etc)
Fix name of ClusterRole in ClusterRoleBinding
@mdditt2000
Copy link

@kavitha-f5 @f5tsomanchi dev can you please review and approve @chen23 commits. TY

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 3, 2019

@chen23 @rendhalver - Fixes from PR#18, require CLA to be signed. Please find the CLA document at https://clouddocs.f5.com/containers/v2/cla_landing.html. Please submit/email a signed copy of the same to [email protected] to consider the fix. Please include your github handle in the CLA email.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 8, 2019

@chen23 - Can you please separate your fix for PR#18. @rendhalver fix requires CLA be signed and also need to attach that CLA in this conversation and I feel it may take time.

@chen23
Copy link
Contributor Author

chen23 commented May 8, 2019

per your request I have created a separate PR #25

@trinaths
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this PR, since changes have been integrated.

@trinaths trinaths closed this Mar 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants