Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moved the join clause from the SelectStatement to the StatementContainer #23

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2016
Merged

Conversation

kwhat
Copy link
Collaborator

@kwhat kwhat commented Feb 2, 2016

… because it can be used for cross table filtering on any query.

Alex Barker added 2 commits February 2, 2016 10:01
…ner because it can be used for cross table filtering on any query.
…is to allow the creation of other unconventional statement types like stored procedures. I alos moved the join clause from the select to the abstract StatementContainer. Some of these maybe backward compatable.
@FaaPz FaaPz added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Feb 3, 2016
@FaaPz
Copy link
Owner

FaaPz commented Feb 3, 2016

@kwhat Let me know when I can merge the whole PR. 😉

@kwhat
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kwhat commented Feb 4, 2016

@FaaPz So I am not entirely sure how many changes I need to make ;) A lot of these changes are just suggestions based on some of the interface changes I needed to make for MsSql support. I would like to keep the commits small and iterate, so let me find a good cut off point and i'll let you know. I need to focus on stabilizing the code I am using your library with for the next couple of weeks, but I'll probably start making new PR's after that.

On a related note, is there a v2 road map and/or timeline?

@FaaPz
Copy link
Owner

FaaPz commented Feb 12, 2016

Yes, of course! I finally made a small road map, but it's far from complete... #27

@FaaPz FaaPz merged commit 869fab6 into FaaPz:v2-dev Apr 10, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants