-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Zygote rule for *(::AbstractFFTs.Plan, ::AbstractArray)
#1437
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The potentially incorrect Zygote rules for FFT (FluxML#899) can be removed now that comprehensive Chain Rules have been added in JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#67
I assume they can't be removed right now since the AbstractFFT PR is not sufficient - downstream packages have to implement the adjoint functionality first. Otherwise the rules will just error. |
Indeed, tests fail currently since e.g. |
Sorry to just bump this, but I've also run into #899 and wanted to check whether this can be solved. As JuliaMath/FFTW.jl#249 has been merged, would it be possible to tag a patch release of FFTW and merge this? |
rerunning CI |
@stevengj, @devmotion could you do this?
|
For tests to pass with this PR, we also need an |
The potentially incorrect Zygote rules for FFT (#899) can be removed now that comprehensive Chain Rules have been added in JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#67
cc @devmotion
PR Checklist
[ ] Tests are added[ ] Documentation, if applicable