Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README with enhanced information and communication channels #1769

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

otavio
Copy link
Member

@otavio otavio commented Mar 13, 2024

Enhanced the README file by adding detailed maintenance policies for the
meta-freescale layer, including information about branch management
and release cycles.

Additionally, included specifics about the maintained branches such as
master, scarthgap, nanbield, and kirkstone. This update aims to
provide users with a clearer understanding of the project's maintenance
practices and available branches.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador [email protected]

Copy link
Contributor

@thochstein thochstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me :-)

Copy link
Contributor

@kraj kraj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@angolini
Copy link
Member

angolini commented Mar 13, 2024 via email

Copy link
Contributor

@zandrey zandrey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of points from my side.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- **Yocto Project LTS Releases:** Our LTS branches follow the Yocto Project LTS release schedule, which involves a four-year maintenance period. A new LTS version is typically released every two years.
- **Stable Releases:** We aim to provide stable releases every six months, aligning with the pace of Yocto Project's stable releases.

## Contributing
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've seen that people still occasionally use meta-frescale ML. Shall this be mentioned here in any form (e.g., patches, discussions, etc.), or a note that ML is not used and shall be sunset?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It'd be good to sunset it and adopt the GitHub Discussions.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've said in email replies to the mailing list several times that we are migrating the conversation to github.

I don't understand exactly what "sunset" means here. Is it possible to disable new emails to be sent to the mailing list?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rpurdie, can we have it with an automated reply or similar?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@otavio You mean make the mailing list read only? We can do that

Enhanced the README file by adding detailed maintenance policies for the
`meta-freescale` layer, including information about branch management
and release cycles.

Additionally, included specifics about the maintained branches such as
`master`, `scarthgap`, `nanbield`, and `kirkstone`. This update aims to
provide users with a clearer understanding of the project's maintenance
practices and available branches.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>
@otavio otavio merged commit 5d2d091 into master Apr 10, 2024
@otavio otavio deleted the rework-readme branch April 10, 2024 18:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants