Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hathor Play #539

Open
wants to merge 186 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Hathor Play #539

wants to merge 186 commits into from

Conversation

andreabadesso
Copy link
Contributor

Acceptance Criteria

  • Include here all things that this PR should solve

Security Checklist

  • Make sure you do not include new dependencies in the project unless strictly necessary and do not include dev-dependencies as production ones. More dependencies increase the possibility of one of them being hijacked and affecting us.

@andreabadesso andreabadesso self-assigned this Aug 22, 2024
@andreabadesso andreabadesso added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 22, 2024
@andreabadesso andreabadesso force-pushed the hathorplay-base branch 2 times, most recently from 25e667e to 9b26d6c Compare August 22, 2024 13:49
@andreabadesso andreabadesso changed the base branch from master to feat/rpc-lib-integration August 22, 2024 13:49
@andreabadesso andreabadesso force-pushed the feat/rpc-lib-integration branch from 9006201 to 73aaf80 Compare August 29, 2024 13:05
@andreabadesso andreabadesso force-pushed the hathorplay-base branch 2 times, most recently from 197d665 to 8ea51df Compare August 31, 2024 21:07
andreabadesso and others added 30 commits September 12, 2024 17:29
* fix: empty caller after define first address

* feat: set caller address when nano contract is registered

* fix: caller address indetermination feedback

- It should inform the caller was not set and ask user to select one when:
  - the registered nano contract doesn't have an address, which should not happen anymore
  - the first address request fails, which can happen when the effect is requested by a initilize call
      or by a not registered nano contract

* fix: restore blueprint info loading value
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants