Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New exception if uninstall fails but cask is installed #12076

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

New exception if uninstall fails but cask is installed #12076

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jcrben
Copy link

@jcrben jcrben commented Jun 23, 2015

I ran into the well-known problem with uninstalling casks when the version has been incremented a bit ago (see for example #2988); my understanding is that this error would be simple to fix but right now it exists due to the project looking forward to brew cask upgrade. I think an exception like this is helpful: it informs the users that the problem is known and tells them how to proceed. All that's needed is to check /opt/homebrew-cask/Caskroom/[cask] rather than checking for a specific version. I'm really not very familiar with Ruby. If there's interest in merging this in I can try to look at tests as necessary but I'd appreciate help.

@alebcay alebcay added core Issue with Homebrew itself rather than with a specific cask. enhancement labels Jun 23, 2015
@vitorgalvao
Copy link
Member

Pinging @ndr-qef @phinze.

@vitorgalvao
Copy link
Member

We’ll be having some changes in the future that should render this unecessary, but I’ll keep it open for now.

@vitorgalvao
Copy link
Member

Here are the news: #13201. Thank you for working on this, but it will no longer be needed.

@miccal miccal removed core Issue with Homebrew itself rather than with a specific cask. enhancement future labels Dec 23, 2016
@Homebrew Homebrew locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 8, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants