f: stash #249
f: stash #249
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
Cargo.toml (1)
35-52: Consider dependency modernization strategyThe pattern of downgrading multiple critical dependencies (rand, secp256k1, tiny-keccak) suggests underlying architectural constraints. Consider:
- Documenting the specific constraints requiring these older versions
- Creating a modernization plan to upgrade these dependencies
- If the constraints are from indirect dependencies, consider using cargo-tree to identify and resolve the conflicts
Would you like assistance in creating a dependency modernization plan or analyzing the constraint tree?
packages/injective-testing/src/multi_test/address_generator.rs (4)
5-7: Remove commented import statements.Clean up the code by removing the commented-out import statements as they're no longer needed and maintaining them adds unnecessary noise to the codebase.
-// use rand::rngs::OsRng; use secp256k1::Secp256k1; -// use secp256k1::{rand, Secp256k1, SecretKey};
77-79: Improve error handling for RNG initialization.Using
expect()with a descriptive message is preferred overunwrap()for better error diagnostics in production.- let mut rng = OsRng::new().expect("failed to create new random number generator"); + let mut rng = OsRng::new().expect("Failed to initialize secure random number generator for key generation");
80-80: Remove commented code.Clean up the implementation by removing commented-out code. If this information is important, consider adding it as documentation instead.
- // let (_, public_key) = secp256k1.generate_keypair(&mut rng).expect("failed to generate key pair"); - // let keccak = tiny_keccak::keccakf(public_key_array);Also applies to: 84-84
102-129: Enhance test coverage and performance.The test module is well-structured but could be improved in the following ways:
- The uniqueness test with just two addresses isn't comprehensive enough. Consider testing with a larger sample size.
- The regex pattern could be defined as a constant to avoid recompilation in each test run.
Here's a suggested improvement:
#[cfg(test)] mod tests { use super::*; use regex::Regex; + + // Define regex as a constant using lazy_static + use lazy_static::lazy_static; + lazy_static! { + static ref BECH32_REGEX: Regex = Regex::new(r"^inj[1-9a-z]{38}$").unwrap(); + } #[test] fn test_generate_inj_address() { // Generate an Injective address let generated_address = generate_inj_address(); // Ensure the generated address is not empty assert!(!generated_address.to_string().is_empty(), "Generated address should not be empty"); // Ensure the generated address starts with the Injective prefix assert!(generated_address.as_str().starts_with("inj"), "Generated address should start with 'inj'"); // Ensure the address matches a valid bech32 format - let bech32_regex = Regex::new(r"^inj[1-9a-z]{38}$").unwrap(); assert!( - bech32_regex.is_match(generated_address.as_str()), + BECH32_REGEX.is_match(generated_address.as_str()), "Generated address does not match valid bech32 format" ); - // Ensure each generated address is unique (you can extend this for more iterations) - let another_generated_address = generate_inj_address(); - assert_ne!(generated_address, another_generated_address, "Generated addresses should be unique"); + // Test uniqueness with a larger sample + let mut addresses = std::collections::HashSet::new(); + for _ in 0..100 { + let addr = generate_inj_address(); + assert!(addresses.insert(addr), "Generated duplicate address"); + } } }Don't forget to add the
lazy_staticdependency to yourCargo.toml:[dependencies] lazy_static = "1.4"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Cargo.toml(1 hunks)packages/injective-cosmwasm/src/exchange/spot_market.rs(2 hunks)packages/injective-testing/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)packages/injective-testing/src/multi_test/address_generator.rs(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/injective-testing/Cargo.toml (2)
21-21: Verify workspace dependency consistency.
Let's ensure the regex dependency is properly declared in the workspace root.
✅ Verification successful
Workspace dependency configuration is correctly set up
The regex dependency is properly declared in the root Cargo.toml with version "1.11.1" and correctly referenced as a workspace dependency in packages/injective-testing/Cargo.toml.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify regex dependency configuration in workspace
# Expected: Find regex declaration in root Cargo.toml with version 1.11.1
# Check root Cargo.toml for regex dependency
rg "regex.*=.*\"1\.11\.1\"" "Cargo.toml"
# Check other packages for regex usage to ensure consistent workspace usage
fd -e toml . packages/ -x rg -l "regex.*workspace.*true" {}
Length of output: 174
21-21: LGTM! Verify regex usage.
The addition of the regex dependency looks good, but let's verify where it's being used in the testing package.
✅ Verification successful
Regex dependency is properly used in tests
The regex dependency is actively used in the testing package's address generator tests to validate the format of generated Injective addresses. The implementation shows proper usage for bech32 address format validation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where regex is being used in the testing package
# Expected: Find actual usage of the regex crate in the testing package
# Search for regex usage in the testing package
rg -l "use.*regex" "packages/injective-testing/src/"
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of regex in the address_generator.rs file
rg "regex" "packages/injective-testing/src/multi_test/address_generator.rs" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 440
packages/injective-cosmwasm/src/exchange/spot_market.rs (2)
6-7: LGTM! Import cleanup aligns with the new Keccak initialization.
The removal of the unused Hasher trait import and simplification to just Keccak matches the implementation changes below.
63-64: Migration to newer Keccak API looks good.
The change from v256() to new_keccak256() follows the newer tiny-keccak API while maintaining the same functionality, as verified by the existing test case.
Let's verify the impact on dependent crates:
✅ Verification successful
API migration is safe to proceed
The verification shows that:
- The old
Keccak::v256()API is only present in the commented line being replaced - The only usage of Keccak is in the
spot_market.rsfile being modified - While there are several dependent crates, they rely on the public API of
injective-cosmwasmand not on its internal implementation details
Since this is an internal implementation change that maintains the same functionality and doesn't affect the public API, the migration is safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other usages of the old v256() API that might need updating
rg "Keccak::v256\(\)"
# Check if any other crates depend on this package
fd -g "Cargo.toml" -x grep -l "injective-cosmwasm"
Length of output: 441
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of dependent crates' Cargo.toml to see if they directly depend on injective-cosmwasm
for file in ./contracts/injective-cosmwasm-stargate-example/Cargo.toml ./contracts/injective-cosmwasm-mock/Cargo.toml ./contracts/dummy/Cargo.toml ./contracts/atomic-order-example/Cargo.toml ./packages/injective-testing/Cargo.toml; do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file" | grep -A 5 "injective-cosmwasm"
done
# Let's also check if there are any other usages of Keccak in the codebase
rg "use.*Keccak" --type rust
Length of output: 4338
Cargo.toml (4)
37-37: Verify compatibility with new regex dependency and updated versions
The addition of regex and updates to serde and related dependencies look reasonable, but we should verify compatibility across the workspace.
Also applies to: 41-48
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the regex usage and dependency versions across the workspace.
Regex dependency addition is safe and compatible
The regex dependency is only used in test code (packages/injective-testing/src/multi_test/address_generator.rs) and is properly configured as a workspace dependency. All other dependencies, including serde and its ecosystem packages, are using workspace-inherited versions which ensures consistency across the project.
- The regex crate is only used in tests via
use regex::Regex - All dependent crates properly reference it through workspace inheritance (
regex = { workspace = true }) - No version conflicts or multiple versions of regex are found across the workspace
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for regex usage patterns
rg -A 5 "regex::"
# Look for potential version conflicts in nested Cargo.toml files
fd Cargo.toml --exec grep -A 5 -E "regex|serde"
Length of output: 3321
35-36:
Security concern: Significant downgrade of rand dependency
The downgrade from rand 0.8.5 to 0.4.6 is concerning as:
- Version 0.4.6 is significantly outdated (released in 2019)
- Newer versions include important security fixes and improvements
- This could affect the quality and security of random number generation
50-51:
Security concern: Downgrade of tiny-keccak
Downgrading tiny-keccak from 2.0.2 to 1.2.1 is concerning because:
- Version 1.2.1 is significantly older
- The newer version includes the explicit 'keccak' feature which suggests better modularity and potential security improvements
- This affects hash generation which is critical for spot market ID calculation (as mentioned in the PR summary)
39-40:
Critical: Security risk in secp256k1 version downgrade
Downgrading secp256k1 from 0.29.0 to 0.7.1 introduces significant security risks:
- Version 0.7.1 is severely outdated
- Newer versions include critical security fixes and improvements
- This library is used for cryptographic operations, making the version crucial
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
regexfor improved functionality.Bug Fixes
Chores
Cargo.tomlfiles to ensure compatibility and stability.