Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(fix) Implement get_ofac_list_path without a loop #350

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

PavelInjective
Copy link

@PavelInjective PavelInjective commented Sep 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Simplified the logic for determining the path to the OFAC list, enhancing code clarity and efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification to the get_ofac_list_path class method in the pyinjective/ofac.py file. The method's logic has been simplified to construct the path to the OFAC list directly using the current file's directory instead of traversing up the directory structure. This results in a more efficient and straightforward method for resolving the path.

Changes

File Change Summary
pyinjective/ofac.py Updated the logic in get_ofac_list_path to directly construct the path using __file__ and OFAC_LIST_FILENAME, eliminating the previous directory traversal logic.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
A path was found, no need to stop.
With a twist and a turn,
Simplicity we yearn,
Now the OFAC list is quick to drop! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@PavelInjective PavelInjective changed the base branch from master to dev September 23, 2024 19:09
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffd2151 and a5b506f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyinjective/ofac.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
pyinjective/ofac.py (2)

Line range hint 1-56: Final approval: Changes look good overall

The implementation of get_ofac_list_path without a loop has been successfully achieved. The new method is simpler, more direct, and should be more reliable. The changes are well-contained and don't negatively impact the rest of the file.

Great job on improving this part of the code!


Line range hint 28-41: Verify OFAC list file placement after download

The changes to get_ofac_list_path look good, but it's important to ensure that the download_ofac_list method is placing the file in the correct location.

Please run the following script to verify that the OFAC list file is being downloaded to the correct location:

This will help ensure that the download_ofac_list method is consistent with the new get_ofac_list_path implementation.

while os.path.basename(current_directory) != "sdk-python":
current_directory = os.path.dirname(current_directory)
return os.path.join(os.path.join(current_directory, "pyinjective"), OFAC_LIST_FILENAME)
return os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), OFAC_LIST_FILENAME)
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Sep 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approve the changes with a suggestion for improvement

The new implementation of get_ofac_list_path is a significant improvement. It's more straightforward, likely more reliable, and aligns with the PR objective of implementing the method without a loop. Good job on simplifying this!

Consider adding a check to ensure the file exists at the specified location. This could help with debugging if the file is missing or moved. Here's a suggested improvement:

@classmethod
def get_ofac_list_path(cls):
    path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), OFAC_LIST_FILENAME)
    if not os.path.exists(path):
        raise FileNotFoundError(f"OFAC list file not found at {path}")
    return path

This addition would make the method more robust and help catch configuration issues early.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We check for existence of file whenever we want to open it. This function just produces a string with the path to the ofac.json file.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PavelInjective, thank you for the clarification. That makes sense—since the existence of the file is checked when opening it elsewhere, there's no need to add the check in get_ofac_list_path(). The function's purpose is solely to provide the path.

(。・ω・。)


Learnings added
Learnt from: PavelInjective
PR: InjectiveLabs/sdk-python#350
File: pyinjective/ofac.py:25-25
Timestamp: 2024-09-23T19:13:38.964Z
Learning: In `pyinjective/ofac.py`, the function `get_ofac_list_path` only returns the path to the `ofac.json` file; checks for the existence of the file are performed when the file is opened elsewhere.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants