-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 476
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Builtins] Make unlifting lazy again #6434
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Builtins] Make unlifting lazy again #6434
Conversation
/benchmark validation |
/benchmark nofib |
/benchmark lists |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '4b8e137e1' (base) and 'd63521331' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
-2.3% in total. I don't trust it, probably just a glitch, let's see the next one. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'nofib' on '4b8e137e1' (base) and 'd63521331' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
-1.6% in total and I still don't believe it. Also note how the |
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '4b8e137e1' (base) and 'd63521331' (PR) Results table
|
/benchmark lists |
2 similar comments
/benchmark lists |
/benchmark lists |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '4b8e137e1' (base) and 'd63521331' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '4b8e137e1' (base) and 'd63521331' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '4b8e137e1' (base) and 'd63521331' (PR) Results table
|
/benchmark validation |
/benchmark lists |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
d635213
to
989b32c
Compare
@kwxm needed rebasing on |
/benchmark validation |
/benchmark lists |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '1d2ad5ab88' (base) and '989b32c0e6' (PR) Results table
| :------| :------: | :------: | :------: | |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '1d2ad5ab88' (base) and '989b32c0e6' (PR) Results table
| :------| :------: | :------: | :------: | |
…to effectfully/builtins/make-unlifting-lazy-again
/benchmark validation |
/benchmark nofib |
/benchmark lists |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '24e3cfc0f' (base) and '74b1b772e' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'nofib' on '24e3cfc0f' (base) and '74b1b772e' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '24e3cfc0f' (base) and '74b1b772e' (PR) Results table
|
This is technically a regression performance-wise, but we may already be charging for it (depends on how budgeting calibration works), so let's see, maybe it's not detectable regardless.