Site updated: 2024-09-09 15:56:51

blogs/45253/index.html

@@ -302,6 +302,8 @@ <h1 id="第二章-什么是单元测试"><a href="#第二章-什么是单元测
 <li>The two schools of unit testing: classical  and London  单元测试的两个流派：经典和伦敦 </li>
 <li>The differences between unit, integration,  and end-to-end tests 单元、集成和端到端测试之间的区别</li>
 </ul>
+<span id="more"></span>
+
 <p>As mentioned in chapter 1, there are a surprising number of nuances in the definition of a unit test. Those nuances are more important than you might think—so much so that the differences in interpreting them have led to two distinct views on how to approach unit testing.</p>
 <p>正如第一章所提到的，在单元测试的定义中，有许多令人惊讶的细微差别。这些细微差别比你想象的要重要得多–以至于对它们的解释的差异导致了对如何进行单元测试的两种不同观点。</p>
 <p>These views are known as the classical and the London schools of unit testing. The classical school is called “classical” because it’s how everyone originally approached unit testing and test-driven development. The London school takes root in the programming community in London. The discussion in this chapter about the differences between the classical and London styles lays the foundation for chapter 5, where I cover the topic of mocks and test fragility in detail.</p>