New package: JudiLingMeasures v0.1.0

[JuliaRegistrator]

• Registering package: JudiLingMeasures
• Repository: https://github.com/quantling/JudiLingMeasures.jl
• Created by: @MariaHei
• Version: v0.1.0
• Commit: d29ad854857069c2e117ec550dd106cb938265c5
• Reviewed by: @MariaHei
• Reference: register quantling/JudiLingMeasures.jl#3 (comment)
• Description: Calculate measures for Discriminative Lexicon models developed with JudiLing.

[github-actions]

Your new package pull request does not meet the guidelines for auto-merging. Please make sure that you have read the General registry README and the AutoMerge guidelines. The following guidelines were not met:

• Package name starts with "Ju".

Note that the guidelines are only required for the pull request to be merged automatically. However, it is strongly recommended to follow them, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

After you have fixed the AutoMerge issues, simply retrigger Registrator, which will automatically update this pull request. You do not need to change the version number in your Project.toml file (unless of course the AutoMerge issue is that you skipped a version number, in which case you should change the version number).

If you do not want to fix the AutoMerge issues, please post a comment explaining why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. Then, send a message to the #pkg-registration channel in the Julia Slack to ask for help. Include a link to this pull request.

Since you are registering a new package, please make sure that you have also read the package naming guidelines: https://pkgdocs.julialang.org/v1/creating-packages/#Package-naming-guidelines

---

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment. You can edit blocking comments, adding [noblock] to them in order to unblock auto-merging.

[MariaHei]

Hi :)
I realise it's not ideal that the package name starts with "Ju". However, I would really prefer to keep it this way, since it is an add-on to the JudiLing package which is already on the registry under this name (I guess this was accepted when this rule didn't exist yet). Since JudiLingMeasures is very specifically designed to work with JudiLing, I think it would be misleading to not have "JudiLing" in the title.

[goerz]

This is obviously a false positive, so the name is totally fine.