Adds formatting workflow

[ValentinKaisermayer]

No description provided.

[ValentinKaisermayer]

cc @iblislin

[ValentinKaisermayer]

There are many possibilities here.

This creates a PR with the formatted code.
Another possibility would be to check if the code in the PR is formatted. This would have the benefit that the history is cleaner and blame would show the author and not the formatting PR.

[iblislin]

ah, I will vote for the later option.

[ValentinKaisermayer]

Formatting check failed as expected.

[ValentinKaisermayer]

I have no idea why the check still fails. If formatted the files locally and pushed them.

julia> format(".")
true

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.04453% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.83%. Comparing base (3291223) to head (75d2263).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/plotrecipes.jl	21.05%	15 Missing ⚠️
src/apply.jl	91.83%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/tables.jl	80.95%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/timearray.jl	93.87%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/utilities.jl	86.95%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/basemisc.jl	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/broadcast.jl	90.90%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/split.jl	94.73%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #530      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.44%   84.83%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         625      712      +87     
==========================================
+ Hits          534      604      +70     
- Misses         91      108      +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.