Perf improvements for all_equal_simd

[smu160]

This is a draft PR to work on #10.

[PaulDotSH]

Libraries should ignore cargo.lock, can you or @LaihoE add it to .gitignore and remove it?

[LaihoE]

Libraries should ignore cargo.lock, can you or @LaihoE add it to .gitignore and remove it?

done.

[LaihoE]

Thanks, looks good!. Btw be careful with dropping the n in tests too low as it can cause the simd part to never be run.

[LaihoE]

I'm currently working on unrolling the position function. Could you add the UNROLL_FACTOR to the lib.rs next to the SIMD_LEN? I think we should have the same UNROLL_FACTOR for all function (at least for now).

[smu160]

I'm currently working on unrolling the position function. Could you add the UNROLL_FACTOR to the lib.rs next to the SIMD_LEN? I think we should have the same UNROLL_FACTOR for all function (at least for now).

Do you want that here or as a hotfix in a separate PR?

[LaihoE]

I'm currently working on unrolling the position function. Could you add the UNROLL_FACTOR to the lib.rs next to the SIMD_LEN? I think we should have the same UNROLL_FACTOR for all function (at least for now).

Do you want that here or as a hotfix in a separate PR?

just add it to this pr 👍

[LaihoE]

Looks good, can we merge this?

[smu160]

Hi @LaihoE,

Apologies for the belated reply. I'm going to get this PR ready for review now. I'll post the before/after benchmarks as well.

Thank you!!

[smu160]

This PR is a bit outdated given the new changes. I will create a new PR for running benchmarks and plotting the (criterion) data, first.