Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated replace atoms.coordinates() with atoms.positions #3467 #3577

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

updated replace atoms.coordinates() with atoms.positions #3467 #3577

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

manishsaini6421
Copy link
Contributor

@manishsaini6421 manishsaini6421 commented Mar 29, 2022

Fixes #

Changes made in this Pull Request:

PR Checklist

  • Tests?
  • Docs?
  • CHANGELOG updated?
  • Issue raised/referenced?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 29, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3577 (5cdfd26) into develop (bf95f9c) will decrease coverage by 3.91%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3577      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.20%   90.28%   -3.92%     
===========================================
  Files          190      181       -9     
  Lines        24668    23166    -1502     
  Branches      3313        0    -3313     
===========================================
- Hits         23238    20915    -2323     
- Misses        1384     2251     +867     
+ Partials        46        0      -46     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
package/MDAnalysis/analysis/encore/covariance.py 87.69% <0.00%> (ø)
package/MDAnalysis/converters/RDKitParser.py 14.39% <0.00%> (-81.82%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/converters/RDKit.py 16.98% <0.00%> (-81.09%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/analysis/hole2/hole.py 14.47% <0.00%> (-68.43%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/converters/OpenMM.py 38.88% <0.00%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/converters/OpenMMParser.py 44.82% <0.00%> (-55.18%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/analysis/hole2/utils.py 25.78% <0.00%> (-50.32%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/analysis/psa.py 79.14% <0.00%> (-10.14%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/topology/guessers.py 92.24% <0.00%> (-6.98%) ⬇️
package/MDAnalysis/core/selection.py 92.81% <0.00%> (-5.99%) ⬇️
... and 15 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bf95f9c...5cdfd26. Read the comment docs.

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

@manishsaini6421 under normal circumstances we want you to continue working on one PR, namely on PR #3576 . Otherwise comments get lost. They way code review works is that you push work to your repository, it shows up in the PR, we comment, you read and address our comments, push more work, until the reviewers are happy.

Please

Thanks.

@manishsaini6421
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sir, how to change in same PR?

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

Make change in your code, add a commit, push changes to your shiny-new-feature branch. Because the PR is linked to the branch, the commit will show up in the PR.

@manishsaini6421
Copy link
Contributor Author

@orbeckst Sir ,actually my first PR folder is deleted so please consider this one.

@hmacdope
Copy link
Member

@manishsaini6421 we are going to close this PR and continue discussion in your previous PR, as we have already reviewed in that PR.

@hmacdope hmacdope closed this Mar 29, 2022
@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

Now that this PR has been closed and PR #3576 has been reopened, you should be able to continue working on your code as before. Just keep pushing commits and they should show up in PR #3576.

Learning to work with git and GitHub takes some time. There is a lot of help available, e.g., https://docs.github.com/en/get-started#all-docs , but doing it in practice can still be daunting. One reason why we want GSOC applicants to submit code is so that they learn about the process as it is essential for being productive during GSOC.

@manishsaini6421
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hmacdope Sir, please review this one because PR deleted by me from github due to lack of knoledge.
please sir reopen this one and close other one.

@hmacdope
Copy link
Member

As stated above we will continue work in the old PR as it has a full record of our reviews and so on. Sorry about the inconvenience. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants