Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Validator summary function #101

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

davidgamez
Copy link
Member

@davidgamez davidgamez commented May 10, 2023

Description

Adds new validator netlify function to return the summary of the validation results without the list of errors and warnings. This function targets data metrics applications that are only interested in aggregated statistics and reduce the amount of information sent across the network.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 10, 2023

Deploy Preview for gbfs-validator ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4052281
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/gbfs-validator/deploys/66bce257dc00be00080e0758
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-101--gbfs-validator.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@davidgamez davidgamez changed the title add validator summary function feat: Validator summary function Jun 6, 2023
@josee-sabourin josee-sabourin added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 6, 2023
@PierrickP PierrickP mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2023
2 tasks
@cka-y cka-y marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2024 17:03
@cka-y cka-y self-requested a review August 14, 2024 17:08
@cka-y cka-y merged commit 39fd956 into master Aug 14, 2024
7 checks passed
@cka-y cka-y deleted the feat/validator-summary-function branch August 14, 2024 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants