Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TranscriptAssembly pipeline can be improve #3

Open
Juke34 opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

TranscriptAssembly pipeline can be improve #3

Juke34 opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Provide example code Provide an example of code, with data input, output, and other parameters Provide test data A minimal test data should be provided with the request

Comments

@Juke34
Copy link
Collaborator

Juke34 commented Jan 31, 2020

Should be more generalized.
With choice for read aligner:

  • star
  • Hisat2

choice of different assemblers (Why? Because better result: ):

  • denovo:
    • soap denovo trans
    • Oases
    • trinity
  • guided
    • Stringtie
    • Scallop
    • Bayerassembler

And an optional filtering step at the end:
Mikado
EviGene

@mahesh-panchal mahesh-panchal added enhancement New feature or request Provide example code Provide an example of code, with data input, output, and other parameters Provide test data A minimal test data should be provided with the request labels Feb 3, 2020
@LucileSol
Copy link
Contributor

we could also add normalization (as an option if data too big).
do we do denovo or reference guided with trinity? (we could do both)
need QC (transcript QC : detonate, transrate, more?)
need filtering maybe

use scilifelab (nf-core) RNAseq pipeline? to check

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Provide example code Provide an example of code, with data input, output, and other parameters Provide test data A minimal test data should be provided with the request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants