-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NML changes for HRRR_gf and GFS_v17_p8_ugwpv1 #500
Conversation
…th non-conforming COMBLE case DEPHY file
…rcingT to be true and surfaceforcinglsm to be true - ingests LSM data and a forcing surface T
…ts (with new DEPHY-format processed_case_input files)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@grantfirl Looks good to me.
Post-release we need to come up with a way to compare the SCM namelists with their UFS counterparts.
This should be easy to do and help us keep our configurations in the SCM consistent with the UFS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI. When I added this nml, I followed the coupled simulation, https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-weather-model/blob/develop/tests/rt.conf#L29, which is what I thought was the HR4 target, not the control_p8_ugwpv1 test.
Hence the differences here are not isolated to recent GWD updates.
Superceded by #502 |
contains namelist fixes for HRRR_gf to match what is used in the UFS RT hrrr_gf_debug
contains namelist fixes for GFS_v17_p8_ugwpv1 to match what is used in the UFS RT control_p8_ugwpv1
-- differences: do_ca is set to F in the SCM, do_gwd_opt_psl is set to T in the SCM
adds vegtype_frac and soiltype_frac to UFS_case_gen.py and SCM input files (not tested fully since there isn't any UFS data to test this with that we could readily find, although it correctly output the new variables in the DEPHY file and the SCM tries to read them in, they're just set to missing values and therefore not used for initialization in the SCM).
Note: This PR is stacked on the dephy_conversion branch, so #496 should be merged first