Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize wavepostpnt #2657
Optimize wavepostpnt #2657
Changes from 14 commits
d87a550
76a02aa
709e6dc
0acaa37
db300eb
8f4f7ab
fbf73b5
670a7ef
2d94656
0b4a6da
1e49ab9
a7522cf
6dfedca
9817f16
2e9953b
8f40ef7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA
FHMAX_GFS
andFHMAX_WAV_IBP
can differ ifFHMAX_GFS
is greater than 180 hours.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA It seems like
FHMAX_WAV_IBP
should default toFHMAX_WAV
instead ofFHMAX_GFS
inglobal-workflow/parm/config/gfs/config.wave
Lines 100 to 105 in e7909af
And thus change to
Do you think that is correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DavidHuber-NOAA nice catch, yes I do think this is correct.