Update docs related to NOAA CSPs

[weihuang-jedi]

Description

With CSPs now capable or compile and run global-workflow for ATM forecast only, coupled, and gefs, and many changes at ParallelWorks, Docs should be updated to reflect all these changes.

Resolves #3042

Type of change

• Bug fix (fixes something broken)
• New feature (adds functionality)
• Maintenance (code refactor, clean-up, new CI test, etc.)
• [x ] Docs updating

Change characteristics

• Is this a breaking change (a change in existing functionality)? NO
• Does this change require a documentation update? YES
• Does this change require an update to any of the following submodules? NO (If YES, please add a link to any PRs that are pending.)
  • EMC verif-global
  • GDAS
  • GFS-utils
  • GSI
  • GSI-monitor
  • GSI-utils
  • UFS-utils
  • UFS-weather-model
  • wxflow

How has this been tested?

• checked the appearance on web site.

Checklist

• Any dependent changes have been merged and published
• [x ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• [x ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have documented my code, including function, input, and output descriptions
• [x ] My changes generate no new warnings
• New and existing tests pass with my changes
• This change is covered by an existing CI test or a new one has been added
• Any new scripts have been added to the .github/CODEOWNERS file with owners
• [x ] I have made corresponding changes to the system documentation if necessary

[KateFriedman-NOAA]

Don't forget to delete the other pngs that are showing as being added or modified in this PR. Thanks!

[KateFriedman-NOAA]

Curious, what is this being added for?

[gspetro-NOAA]

This enables the use of :numref:%s <target> syntax to refer to numbered items like tables, figures, and sections of the documentation. For some reason, we are still having trouble getting crosslinks to render using both :numref: and :ref:, and I have not had a chance to explore other reasons why that might be, but this line is definitely required for :numref: to work, in addition to whatever other changes may be required.

[KateFriedman-NOAA]

Gotcha, thanks for explaining that @gspetro-NOAA !