-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DNMY] Support in the loop PowerFlow evaluation #1040
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Requires NREL-Sienna/PowerFlows.jl#48. |
@jd-lara I can't tag you for review on this since it's technically your PR, so this is me letting you know that this is ready for review. There's a few |
One issue to consider is the following, in Models with unit commitment (hydro and thermal) if the unit is connected to a PV Bus bus it is essentially off the bus type needs to change to PQ to make the power flow problem feasible. This implies that we need an aux variable for the bus type and then enact that change both in the call to solve as well as in the exporter for any models of the subtype Commitment |
This is a WIP branch to integrate the evaluation of PowerFlows into a simulation loop.
GKS edit: depends on NREL-Sienna/PowerFlows.jl#53