-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change llm judge to rm/generate interface #293
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Gitman <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Largely LGTM. One minor comment.
output_dir: str | None = None | ||
# Used to identify the input file if `input_dir` is provided. If `random_seed` is not provided, | ||
# the input will be assumed to be from 'greedy' generation | ||
random_seed: str | None = None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why str? Int's should be nullable, but you might have to use null
from cmdline instead of None
. Perplexity example here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just copied whatever was in the reward model script without checking. Let me update both
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
on a second thought, let me keep it as is for now - I think eventually we should move this parameter out of here to the pipeline part
No description provided.