More conversions between QQFieldElem and Rational #1571
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1571 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.21% 84.18% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 94 94
Lines 36634 36634
==========================================
- Hits 30850 30842 -8
- Misses 5784 5792 +8
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
fingolfin
force-pushed
the
mh/Rational-QQFieldElem-conversion
branch
from
5f4c1c6 to
2677441
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before we only allowed conversion of
QQFieldElemtoBase.Rational{BigInt}. Now anyBase.Rational{T} where T<:Integerworks.