Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add traces reader to proof producer #112

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add traces reader to proof producer #112

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

x-mass
Copy link
Contributor

@x-mass x-mass commented Oct 24, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

Clang Test Results

  152 files  ±0    152 suites  ±0   10m 28s ⏱️ -1s
3 179 tests ±0  3 173 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
3 348 runs  ±0  3 342 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 3a59acc. ± Comparison against base commit 6572b08.

Copy link
Collaborator

@akokoshn akokoshn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally OK, i went move it to assigner library (trace_parser): #91

struct StackOp {
bool is_read;
int idx;
blueprint::zkevm_word_type value;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i guess we can keep here executionproofs::Uint256 and make some conversion only when fill assignment table

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same about another values, i mean no need to do conversion from protobuf types to std::byte.
We convert them if need during filling assignment table.
But make sense keep conversion functions for external usage

proof-producer/bin/proof-producer/src/main.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Traces reader

@x-mass x-mass force-pushed the traces branch 2 times, most recently from bd1cd6f to 6c6d726 Compare October 30, 2024 08:53
@akokoshn
Copy link
Collaborator

akokoshn commented Nov 7, 2024

The changes included into #137
@x-mass , i guess we can close this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants