-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fennel-ls: init at 0.1.0 #281653
fennel-ls: init at 0.1.0 #281653
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's a few suggestions!
Also, I think you need to rename the commit to fennel-ls: init at 0.1.0
, to be consistent with the commit conventions
@yisraeldov Maybe also rename this PR's title to "fennel-ls: init at 0.1.0"? |
Could you move the commits around and rebase a bit to make it look like this? It's important that you add yourself to the maintainer list in the commit before the commit with the package.
It might be a good idea to mark the PR as draft if you're unsure if you've rebased correctly. A wrong rebase can lead to pinging a lot of people. |
224866f
to
85ab5f8
Compare
@yisraeldov Looks like you accidentally pulled in an extra commit during the rebase. |
fennel-ls: init at 0.1.0 add fennel-ls package Update pkgs/development/tools/language-servers/fennel-ls/default.nix Co-authored-by: h7x4 <[email protected]> Update pkgs/development/tools/language-servers/fennel-ls/default.nix Co-authored-by: h7x4 <[email protected]> Update pkgs/development/tools/language-servers/fennel-ls/default.nix Co-authored-by: h7x4 <[email protected]> Update pkgs/development/tools/language-servers/fennel-ls/default.nix Co-authored-by: h7x4 <[email protected]> Update pkgs/development/tools/language-servers/fennel-ls/default.nix Co-authored-by: h7x4 <[email protected]> Update pkgs/development/tools/language-servers/fennel-ls/default.nix Co-authored-by: h7x4 <[email protected]> fixes from code review switch to 'by-name'
You are right, thanks, fixed |
Feel free to mark your PR as ready for review again, since the rebase went smooth 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description of changes
Add package fennel-ls
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.