sdrpp: 1.0.4 -> 1.1.0-unstable-2024-01-22

[hzeller]

sdrpp switched to a rolling release, so take a git hash from head.

• Remove pinning to gcc12, as this will break plug-ins that link against a newer version of libc++ (e.g. audio sink).
• Organize the built options by category and sort within.
• Add new build options that have been added since last 1.0.4
• Link against rtl-sdr-osmocom which is a newer superset of rtl-sdr (e.g. works better with rtl-sdr V4).

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[hzeller]

Looks like the pkgs/by-name check did get confused because the line in all-packages.nix was modified. But the package was not in by-name/... before.

[sikmir]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 282448 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:

• sdrpp

[infinisil]

Oh this is an interesting failure of the new pkgs/by-name check, I think it needs some adjustment. I'll look into it, but you can ignore this CI failure, merging the PR won't cause problems.

Edit: CI fix in #283017

[hzeller]

Anyone on this PR with the power to Approve/merge ?

[kirillrdy]

I can merge, @sikmir is this formally approved ?

[sikmir]

Maybe move it here:

Suggested change

	};
	rtl-sdr = rtl-sdr-osmocom; # osmocom better w/ rtlsdr v4
	};

[hzeller]

I think moving that configuration there is probably better done in a separate change.