Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0] [REF] Comunicazione con SdI tramite WebService (SDICoop) + allineamento generale di l10n_it_sdi_channel #3785

Merged
merged 50 commits into from
Aug 30, 2024

Conversation

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sergiocorato,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@eLBati eLBati changed the title 16.0 align l10n it sdi channel [16.0] [REF] Comunicazione con SdI tramite WebService (SDICoop) Dec 14, 2023
@francesco-ooops
Copy link
Contributor

@eLBati #2809 ?

@eLBati
Copy link
Member Author

eLBati commented Dec 14, 2023

@eLBati #2809 ?

Esatto

@eLBati eLBati changed the title [16.0] [REF] Comunicazione con SdI tramite WebService (SDICoop) [16.0] [REF] Comunicazione con SdI tramite WebService (SDICoop) + allineamento generale di l10n_it_sdi_channel Dec 14, 2023
@eLBati
Copy link
Member Author

eLBati commented Dec 18, 2023

#3785 (comment) ne ho messe 4 @tafaRU 😅

@tafaRU
Copy link
Member

tafaRU commented Dec 18, 2023

#3785 (comment) ne ho messe 4 @tafaRU 😅

k allora si tratta di un errore, venerdì abbiamo provato dei filtri con @francesco-ooops e @TheMule71, direi che in questo caso non ha funzionato 😉

@francesco-ooops
Copy link
Contributor

@tafaRU @eLBati tutte le issues linkate manualmente

@eLBati eLBati force-pushed the 16.0-align-l10n_it_sdi_channel branch from fba4c28 to d557c69 Compare December 19, 2023 15:52
@francesco-ooops
Copy link
Contributor

@eLBati questa dunque sostituisce #3716 giusto?

@eLBati
Copy link
Member Author

eLBati commented Dec 19, 2023

@eLBati questa dunque sostituisce #3716 giusto?

Ah, si, non l'avevo notata

@SirAionTech
Copy link
Contributor

Credo risolva anche #2477.

SirTakobi and others added 21 commits August 30, 2024 09:50
Generic sending/delivering fields and views are common to all channels
… avoid to call receive_fe on a specific channel, that could produce security errors in multi-company
…), use flush_model(), flush_recordset() or env.flush_all() instead
…not allowed to modify 'ES channel' (sdi.channel) records.
…uld not behave differently from UI, valid test is test_action_open_export_send_sdi_ui
AssertionError: email_exchange_system is a required field ({'required': [('channel_type', '=', 'pec')], 'invisible': [('channel_type', '!=', 'pec')]})
The signature of fatturapa.attachment.out.get_invoice_obj must be the same of fatturapa.attachment.in.get_invoice_obj because the same method is called on both objects
@eLBati eLBati force-pushed the 16.0-align-l10n_it_sdi_channel branch from b981472 to f143cf4 Compare August 30, 2024 07:51
@SirAionTech SirAionTech removed the needs fixing Has conflicts or is failing mandatory CI checks label Aug 30, 2024
@sergiocorato
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-3785-by-sergiocorato-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit cff59dc into OCA:16.0 Aug 30, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at ee1f87d. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment