-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 305
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0] [FIX] l10n_it_reverse_charge: consider original invoice date in RC invoice comments #4142
base: 16.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Grazie della PR!
Puoi aggiungere un test? Magari ti basta aggiungere un assert
a un test esistente.
Puoi modificare il messaggio del commit per seguire https://github.com/OCA/odoo-community.org/blob/master/website/Contribution/CONTRIBUTING.rst#commit-message? In particolare:
please check if the commit message is cut with ellipsis
date=self.date, | ||
date=reference_date, | ||
internal_reference=self.name, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Se il riferimento interno è di self
, mi aspetto che anche la data venga presa da self
: quindi secondo me la scelta sta tra self.date
e self.invoice_date
(da decidere in #4141 (comment)).
Una volta scelto si potrebbe anche chiarire nel testo della descrizione quale delle due date è riportata.
d02725d
to
a3cf3ad
Compare
/ocabot rebase |
For some unknown reason, since its inception (? OCA@e460d4d ) the description relating to the original invoice, always used the date of the RC document, not the actual one.
Congratulations, PR rebased to 16.0. |
fd1b1f4
to
288ac14
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test funzionale: OK
For some unknown reason, since its inception (? e460d4d ) the description relating to the original invoice, always used the date of the RC document, not the actual one.
Fixes: #4141