Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][ADD] project_tag_hierarchy: New module #1348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

victoralmau
Copy link
Member

@victoralmau victoralmau commented Oct 11, 2024

New module

Please @pilarvargas-tecnativa and @carlos-lopez-tecnativa can you review it?

@Tecnativa TT51195

@victoralmau victoralmau changed the title [16.0][WIP] project_tag_hierarchy: New module [16.0][ADD] project_tag_hierarchy: New module Oct 17, 2024
@victoralmau victoralmau marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 07:06
Copy link
Contributor

@carlos-lopez-tecnativa carlos-lopez-tecnativa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Oct 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1348-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 0851e20 into OCA:16.0 Oct 17, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 35a2314. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 16.0-add-project_tag_hierarchy branch October 17, 2024 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants