-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][MIG] product_expiry_simple #1320
Conversation
/coabot migration product_expiry_simple |
/ocabot migration product_expiry_simple |
@alexis-via please, could you rebase? and check if all is green? 🍏 Thank you! |
8f8953b
to
1651c61
Compare
@rafaelbn done |
|
@hparfr yes, it's intended ! |
@bosd here is an example for you when you have a module that is incompatible with another module of the same repo and you need to have the tests green. |
@sbidoul Do we have a solution for incompatible modules? I remember that if we want to keep runboat running, this kind of module should have its specific repository. |
/ocabot merge nobump |
Sorry @alexis-via you are not allowed to merge. To do so you must either have push permissions on the repository, or be a declared maintainer of all modified addons. If you wish to adopt an addon and become it's maintainer, open a pull request to add your GitHub login to the |
I am the declared maintainer of product_expiry_simple, cf https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow/blob/14.0/product_expiry_simple/__manifest__.py |
Bots don't like being insulted. The reason is likely that this PR is modifying other stuff than the addon being migrated. |
@rousseldenis you may remember this: sbidoul/runboat#95 |
@alexis-via Could you rebase to move forward on this as runboat has now two databases (one with all modules, one just with 'base') ? |
/ocabot rebase |
@rafaelbn The rebase process failed, because command
|
1651c61
to
fd7953e
Compare
rebased |
…n the picking type Update FR translation
Fix bad decorator
Travis: exclude the module because it conflicts with product_expiry
9f4116a
to
e0522c4
Compare
Field 'use_expiry_date' on product.template is now a computed field, like the native 'tracking' field.
e0522c4
to
0218380
Compare
rebase done |
@alexis-via Could you just let me know what was blocking in tests to have this seggregated in separate test flow (as I see you use the 'use_expiry_date`for constraint checks, so it shouldn't block other tests? |
@rousseldenis either you install product_expiry OR product_expiry_simple, but not both ! In the manifest of product_expiry_simple, I added
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at f61f438. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
I migrated the module in october 2022, but it seems that I forgot to make the PR... sorry about that.