more explanations on settings #367
Conversation
and back-reference for "show copybooks on hover"
|
|
|
requesting review from @nberth - feel free to move those changes to a different file in the case of generated package.json; but note that the "special line breaks" double+space, then lf do an "actual" line break, so those should be kept |
| a list, where each entry describes a file extension if the copybook name cannot | ||
| be found as-is (for example `COPY "mycpy.lib"`). | ||
| In SuperBOL, the `default` option does not correspond to GnuCOBOL's default, but to "cpy" and | ||
| "cbx" only. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is GnuCOBOL's default list actually cpy cbl cob as hinted here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, first in upper, then in lower-case
|
@nberth: any updates on this? I'm not sure if #368 is likely to be finished soon and have a "frontend" in the vscode extension (it definitely sounds interesting), but with all the other important changes since the last release I'd like to see 0.1.4 going out "rather soon" - and thise one seems like a low hanging fruit before... |
and back-reference for "show copybooks on hover"
this originates on me wondering why it did not work "as suggested by the README".
Question: Wouldn't it be reasonable for the LSP to have a list of the file names and if there's only a single one to match the copybook for hover/show definition`?
This would lead to most environments working "out of the box".