MDPI Journal Submission

[kchiu002]

Add MDPI journal submission

[capsulecorplab]

added some notes on abstract

[kchiu002]

Reviewer 1: How adaptable would the docs-as-code format be with SysML V2 or the other modeling languages?

Sean: SysML V1 XMI is a file-based interchange but can only handle graphical views and not textual views.

Resolved 7ec031a

[kchiu002]

Reviewer 1: If applicable, did you test to see how quickly a novice to systems engineering and CubeSat design could grasp the process and start building the architecture?

Resolved 7ec031a

[kchiu002]

Reviewer 1: Is there a supplemental help guide or comments throughout the code to help newcomers and other universities “digest” the information?

Resolved 7ec031a

[kchiu002]

Reviewer 1: Did this docs-as-code process help with any changes that came with your launch delay? Was it a subjectively quicker turnaround with the changes? How much longer would changes take to implement without this template?

Resolved 7ec031a

[kchiu002]

Reviewer 2: The paper mainly focused on the case presentation but missed the discussion part. It is primarily related to how the utilized approach helps better understand and analyze the stakeholder needs and requirements. In my opinion, this should be added.

Resolved 7ec031a

[kchiu002]

Reviewer 2: Please also add what kind of risks and weaknesses (if any) have been observed and ev, how they have been managed.

Resolved 7ec031a

[kchiu002]

Reviewer 2: Please also consider how this case/paper helps elaborate the systems engineering state of the art.

Resolved 7ec031a

[capsulecorplab]

add cc-by-4.0 license

[capsulecorplab]

Reviewer 2: The paper mainly focused on the case presentation but missed the discussion part. It is primarily related to how the utilized approach helps better understand and analyze the stakeholder needs and requirements. In my opinion, this should be added.

Not sure what section to address this. Perhaps there needs to be a "Future work" section mentioning the need for development of the dof-cubesat data model and training material

[capsulecorplab]

Reviewer 2: Please also add what kind of risks and weaknesses (if any) have been observed and ev, how they have been managed.

Also not sure what section to address this, as exploring the risks/weaknesses assumes the entire team is onboard/adopted/actively-using the approach. At the time of writing, only a few members of the team (namely the authors) have been brought up to speed with the approach. In addition, the training material, which depends on a fully defined spec of dof-cubesat, would need to be in place in order to effectively guide teams adopting the approach before any such assessment of its risks/weaknesses can be addressed.